Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 778371" data-attributes="member: 32260">I really think about opening the general thread about Microsoft. This will be probably a very hot thread. I share your thoughts in a great deal (and probably most MT members), but the Microsoft sins (there are many more) have a little to do with more practical aspects of Defender security. People should choose or not choose WD, because of its practical aspects, but not because Microsoft is guilty (we now it is).<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up&nbsp; &nbsp; (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" />Let&#039;s forget&nbsp; temporarily about Microsoft politics and try to focus on the practice. I know that it will be hard. It was hard for me too, because my software was ridiculously banned by M$.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite112" alt=":mad:" title="Mad&nbsp; &nbsp; :mad:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":mad:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 778371, member: 32260"] I really think about opening the general thread about Microsoft. This will be probably a very hot thread. I share your thoughts in a great deal (and probably most MT members), but the Microsoft sins (there are many more) have a little to do with more practical aspects of Defender security. People should choose or not choose WD, because of its practical aspects, but not because Microsoft is guilty (we now it is).(y) Let's forget temporarily about Microsoft politics and try to focus on the practice. I know that it will be hard. It was hard for me too, because my software was ridiculously banned by M$.:mad: [/QUOTE]

Verification