App Review Thoughts on HitManPro

It is advised to take all reviews with a grain of salt. In extreme cases some reviews use dramatization for entertainment purposes.
Content created by
cruelsister
3 now bazang has gotten bored trolling this forum. But coming next year "NEW VERSION, SAME BUGS, SAME PROTECTION". Sometimes software should just die a graceful death.
Need to set a record straight here. Bazang actually works in the industry, unlike a lot of the arm chair users here, and is often at work.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why do you keep criticizing other forum members? Not everyone here works in the industry nor is this a requirement for forum membership, if that were the case there would be less then 20 members here and the forum wouldn't last another week. Just remember there is a difference from being in an industry and actually being good at it. ( Not a shot at Bazang).
 
Need to set a record straight here. Bazang actually works in the industry, unlike a lot of the arm chair users here, and is often at work.
And you know this for a fact how? It's the internet, anybody is could be anybody but is usually no body with just personal opinions. Anyway as predicted he got bored and left.
 
Wow they have more of a user base than I thought, I'm sure it's enterprise use mainly. Didn't Sophos buy that business router company years ago? SophosXG I think is it's name!

They also have a pretty well reguarded Next Gen Firewall product, I remmber people back 15 years ago were using Sophos Firewall like they did/do with pFsense.
Yeah I think it was Untangle UTM I used to run it at home.
 
I prefer a manual, heuristics-based approach to diagnostics over reliance on automated scanners. Using the Sysinternals suite (Process Explorer, Autoruns, and TCPView) integrated with VirusTotal, I can identify active infections by analyzing process behaviors, persistence mechanisms, and network traffic.

While automated scanners are useful, they are prone to false positives and negatives. I believe effective security requires the ability to manually verify findings and inspect common malware drop locations in the file system.
 
I didn't really care for Sirius. But have been flirting with CyberLock 9.0 beta and have been very impressed. After a brief hour with it what came to mind was A.C. Clarke's statement that "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic".
 
I didn't really care for Sirius. But have been flirting with CyberLock 9.0 beta and have been very impressed. After a brief hour with it what came to mind was A.C. Clarke's statement that "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic".

I had a single Chrome.vbs file analyzed that had also received an FP from NPE:

App Review - Thoughts on HitManPro

2.png

Instead, it is a Chrome.VBS file that I use to overcome the Chromium Command Line Switches limit.

I understand the logic behind the detection.

So I wonder if Sirus LLM (I also used the beta) is roughly on the same level as NPE.:unsure:
 
I prefer a manual, heuristics-based approach to diagnostics over reliance on automated scanners. Using the Sysinternals suite (Process Explorer, Autoruns, and TCPView) integrated with VirusTotal, I can identify active infections by analyzing process behaviors, persistence mechanisms, and network traffic.

While automated scanners are useful, they are prone to false positives and negatives. I believe effective security requires the ability to manually verify findings and inspect common malware drop locations in the file system.
The problem with Sysinternals is you rely on the skill of the user to distinguish malicious files from safe. With AV/AM this is done for me without endless hours researching.

+ most diagnostic suites and tools revert back to VirusTotal to give a safety score so your back at scanners then.

I actually find manual scanning tools for IOCs etc very boring, not my thing. Better use of my time than searching through endless registry entries.

I do however like reading research and reports, but doing the manual work nah not for me.
 
That is not a good idea, AV might prevent further infection, but between uninstallation and installation of another AV, malware can spread and even block installation of AV.

In case a serious infection or when looking for an alternative scan, it is better to use a bootable AV then.
P.S.: This is why I like Dr.WEB CureIt! It uses a randomized unsigned exe, so it can not be easily blocked.
If I remember correctly there was an bootable ISO that contained them all and other tools among them. Does this still exist or am I going senile? Also just because it exists it doesn't mean that I am not senile.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sorrento
I searched this thread and it did not find MS Defender Offline Scan, which "lets you boot and run a scan from a trusted environment. The scan runs from outside the normal Windows kernel so it can target malware that attempts to bypass the Windows shell, such as viruses and rootkits that infect or overwrite the master boot record (MBR)." is it as effective as linux rescue CD, I dunno, but I do offline scan about once a month... :unsure:
 
  • +Reputation
  • Like
Reactions: Sorrento and ErzCrz
I didn't really care for Sirius. But have been flirting with CyberLock 9.0 beta and have been very impressed. After a brief hour with it what came to mind was A.C. Clarke's statement that "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic".
Then Sirus lives by it's name; a domesticated trusted companion that will watch your domicile and alert you to dangers.
 

You may also like...