Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
Threat landscape and the results of protection based on telemetry data of malware in the wild (March 2023)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Trident" data-source="post: 1037336" data-attributes="member: 99014"><p>I think on the producers pages just these facts and tests are enough. Be careful when copying from websites as they frequently like to claim they are the first and one and only in everything, but then if you fact-check, it is not the case.</p><p>You don’t wanna end up with vendors sending you link to patents and nasty emails.</p><p>Always prioritise the avoidance of drama first.</p><p></p><p>The rest of the information you are considering to include like the CSV with the URLs fits your total transparency philosophy and is a great addition. Just maybe not in the producers page, but in the test page. I believe the URLs and the inspection points monitored are for all products, right? Not individual for different products.</p><p>I believe the information you include and plan to add is already enough work and more than majority of testing organisations. Maybe a little bit more about the malware as well for curious geeks <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🤓" title="Nerd face :nerd:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f913.png" data-shortname=":nerd:" /></p><p>(Not a must).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Trident, post: 1037336, member: 99014"] I think on the producers pages just these facts and tests are enough. Be careful when copying from websites as they frequently like to claim they are the first and one and only in everything, but then if you fact-check, it is not the case. You don’t wanna end up with vendors sending you link to patents and nasty emails. Always prioritise the avoidance of drama first. The rest of the information you are considering to include like the CSV with the URLs fits your total transparency philosophy and is a great addition. Just maybe not in the producers page, but in the test page. I believe the URLs and the inspection points monitored are for all products, right? Not individual for different products. I believe the information you include and plan to add is already enough work and more than majority of testing organisations. Maybe a little bit more about the malware as well for curious geeks 🤓 (Not a must). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top