My custom HIPS Rules, this set blocks 70-80% of the RATS out there.
I've seen Eset's HIPS intervene only once and that happened when it was put it in Smart mode. After updating one of my applications, it detected that application was changed and it notified me about it and asked if it should let it run. Though I can't remember which application raised that notification.In all these years I never saw a single behavioural detection from Eset. The behavioural blocking is explained to be “an extension to HIPS) but I haven’t seen it doing anything.
There are like 6 or 7 powershells if you do an Explorer search. I include all of them ( those that show the correct icon ) in my rules.My custom HIPS Rules
Where can i find your HIPS rules ? You placed them here ?There are like 6 or 7 powershells if you do an Explorer search. I include all of them ( those that show the correct icon ) in my rules.
Thank you for sharing.
This sample was blocked by McAfee as soon as it was extracted from the compressed file. Did Eset Smart Security Premium fail to detect it?New Lumma Stealer :
Nope ESET was one of the first who detect it.This sample was blocked by McAfee as soon as it was extracted from the compressed file. Did Eset Smart Security Premium fail to detect it?
Oh good, I thought ESET hadn't detected it.Nope ESET was one of the first who detect it.
If Windows does not use mshta.exe, update your hips and add C:\Windows\System32\mshta.exe to blocked. Based on this information Proactive Protection Against DonutLoader with Command-Line Emulation Credit goes to @Khushal for the original post he posted from Symantec Static Data Scanner, which can be found here.
When first I opened the VT link @TuxTalk posted, ESET didn't detect it. But they later started detecting it again with the same name as it was detected as originally.Oh good, I thought ESET hadn't detected it.![]()
In fact, ESET is fast. I assume it is cloud-based, heuristic, emulation, or something of that nature. If it does not detect it the first time, it will certainly detect it the second time.When first I opened the VT link @TuxTalk posted, ESET didn't detect it. But they later started detecting it again with the same name as was detected as originally.
Liveguard ;-)In fact, ESET is fast. I assume it is cloud-based, heuristic, emulation, or something of that nature. If it does not detect it the first time, it will certainly detect it the second time.
According to VT no, but it was detected already like i posted. VT is not immediately up to date !When first I opened the VT link @TuxTalk posted, ESET didn't detect it. But they later started detecting it again with the same name as it was detected as originally.
I confess that I had forgotten about cscript.exe and wsccript.exe, which encompass .js and .vbs files. You will find a complete list in @Andy Ful tool.
ESET detection is sophisticated, cutting-edge technology. I don't know why people complain about ESET.It complements other ESET technologies like LiveGrid® and Threat Intelligence, forming a multi-layered defense system. [help.eset.com], [www.eset.com], [help.eset.com], [help.eset.com], [www.eset.com]
Nope havent got one and the tests online also very low.Is ESET still bothering with FPs?