Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Browsers
Web Extensions
[Updated 29/12/2018] Browser extension comparison: Malwares and Phishings
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vitali Ortzi" data-source="post: 1122928" data-attributes="member: 57714"><p>I have some random tests out of boredom in recent days in my system against pishing on open pish and so far the block ratio is 100% (tried 250 pages each now and then from there and some recent pishing pages from GitHub , pish tank ) although at least one had to be blocked using checkpoint zero pishing tech (bypasses everything else )</p><p>Anyway I'm actually amazed how it basically replaced my usage of a few extensions while having even better results (traffic light , Symantec , Microsoft)</p><p></p><p></p><p> The urlf filtering is done by Eset (av used on the system ) , extensions (Checkpoint + Osprey ) , DNS (quad9), browser (google safe browsing )</p><p></p><p></p><p>Obviously against actual zero day pishing everything will fail but so far browsing is snappier then ever and the detection is better then ever so I'm absolutely thankfully we have </p><p>Osprey that doesn't waste io , CPU , ram (would recommend to install even on a 2gb ram system ) and it shouldn't really make a delay that's at least easily measurable as it doesn't hold pages hence making it hard to even try and do a calculation of page loading time like debug bear does to benchmark extensions</p><p></p><p>oh and those that don't trust Osprey can just clone the repo and manually check the js code and update themselves each time rather then installing from the store and there probably won't be a big change in providers anyway as it already has the best ones that are easy enough to implement (no requirement for auth logic , local databases or anything complex to implement )</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vitali Ortzi, post: 1122928, member: 57714"] I have some random tests out of boredom in recent days in my system against pishing on open pish and so far the block ratio is 100% (tried 250 pages each now and then from there and some recent pishing pages from GitHub , pish tank ) although at least one had to be blocked using checkpoint zero pishing tech (bypasses everything else ) Anyway I'm actually amazed how it basically replaced my usage of a few extensions while having even better results (traffic light , Symantec , Microsoft) The urlf filtering is done by Eset (av used on the system ) , extensions (Checkpoint + Osprey ) , DNS (quad9), browser (google safe browsing ) Obviously against actual zero day pishing everything will fail but so far browsing is snappier then ever and the detection is better then ever so I'm absolutely thankfully we have Osprey that doesn't waste io , CPU , ram (would recommend to install even on a 2gb ram system ) and it shouldn't really make a delay that's at least easily measurable as it doesn't hold pages hence making it hard to even try and do a calculation of page loading time like debug bear does to benchmark extensions oh and those that don't trust Osprey can just clone the repo and manually check the js code and update themselves each time rather then installing from the store and there probably won't be a big change in providers anyway as it already has the best ones that are easy enough to implement (no requirement for auth logic , local databases or anything complex to implement ) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top