Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Browsers
Web Extensions
[Updated 29/12/2018] Browser extension comparison: Malwares and Phishings
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Decopi" data-source="post: 725251" data-attributes="member: 67091"><p>[USER=51905]@Evjl's Rain[/USER] I'm totally agree about UBlock degrading browser performance. For many years I used UMatrix, but after Firefox improvements (built-in tracking protection, FPI, containers etc), last year I replaced UMatrix with a tiny lightweight 3rd-party blocker add-on... and it woks like a charm! In brief, no more UMatrix, and no more hosts-file etc for me.</p><p></p><p>Looking at your tests, I tended to like Firefox built-in malware-protection (Safebrowsing = Google). However, and I don't know why, it also degrades browser performance.</p><p></p><p>So, I am back again looking for an add-on.</p><p>I believe I tested most of them.</p><p>I liked AVIRA, but the new Malwarebytes stable release went better in my tests. And the browser performance is great.</p><p>Next week I will do more tests, more carefully.</p><p>And I will wait Malwarebytes' answer.</p><p></p><p>In the worst case and supposing that Malwarebytes = UBlock, in your tests went 30... inside the average results.</p><p>In my tests went even better.</p><p>So, perhaps I will give a chance to Malwarebytes add-on.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Decopi, post: 725251, member: 67091"] [USER=51905]@Evjl's Rain[/USER] I'm totally agree about UBlock degrading browser performance. For many years I used UMatrix, but after Firefox improvements (built-in tracking protection, FPI, containers etc), last year I replaced UMatrix with a tiny lightweight 3rd-party blocker add-on... and it woks like a charm! In brief, no more UMatrix, and no more hosts-file etc for me. Looking at your tests, I tended to like Firefox built-in malware-protection (Safebrowsing = Google). However, and I don't know why, it also degrades browser performance. So, I am back again looking for an add-on. I believe I tested most of them. I liked AVIRA, but the new Malwarebytes stable release went better in my tests. And the browser performance is great. Next week I will do more tests, more carefully. And I will wait Malwarebytes' answer. In the worst case and supposing that Malwarebytes = UBlock, in your tests went 30... inside the average results. In my tests went even better. So, perhaps I will give a chance to Malwarebytes add-on. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top