- Jun 9, 2013
- 6,720
Yes but not enough extentionsare available, otherwise it is a good browser.Have you used Pale Moon? I heard that it is also a good browser, I think it also uses the Firefox code..
Yes but not enough extentionsare available, otherwise it is a good browser.Have you used Pale Moon? I heard that it is also a good browser, I think it also uses the Firefox code..
Yes but not enough extentionsare available, otherwise it is a good browser.
Any day I give Waterfox a chance, the problem is that my system does not get along well with the Firefox code, at least with Mozilla Firefox that way, it never delivers a good performance..Pale Moon is good browser but it's based on a version from around 2013 (might be wrong) but the developer has frequently updated the browser with many security fixes and other things. All I really require is a browser that allows me to do my daily tasks without having to deal with constant annoyances.
Personally I don't care that much for extensions as long as I can block advertisements in the browser (which I can do through Adguard - Desktop) and have a password manager extension to fill all of my passwords. Seeing as Pale Moon doesn't support my password manager I don't really mind copying/pasting the passwords myself.
Any day I give Waterfox a chance, the problem is that my system does not get along well with the Firefox code, at least with Mozilla Firefox that way, it never delivers a good performance..
Well that's right, it's almost the same here with me, besides the high CPU usage and some problems with high-resolution videoMain issue(s) I have with Mozilla Firefox :
- Pages seem to have forever to load when compared to previous version 56 (instant)
- RAM usage is higher than Chrome even though it's advertised to use less than the competitors
- Browser becomes sluggish when switching tabs and becomes unresponsive to clicks after a while
Although I think it's getting better with each daily update to Firefox Nightly.
Well that's right, it's almost the same here with me, besides the high CPU usage and some problems with high-resolution video
I think it is this new Firefox engine that still needs to be polished, need to optimize the use of CPU, RAM and etc, but I believe that little by little they go straight to it, Mozilla has already taken a huge step with this new engine, now it's just focus on the small details that are still missingActually I forgot to mention both of those issues as well in that post.
I spent days trying to fix the issue with high-resolution and couldn't find anything that could fix it.
My main is Opera, the only one that delivers me a great performance, both in terms of resources, when speedWaterfox is 1 of my browsers installed(Edge+Firefox+Opera+Pale Moon & of course my standard browser Google Chrome)
Thanks for this. I forgot to post this update Waterfox.What's new in Waterfox 56.2.2?
Large amounts of security fixes and bug fixes are in this release and should solve two main issues:
View changes
- Certain add-ons not showing their own options page (such as uBlock Origin dashboard).
- Corrupted Content issue on website that use service workers.
- Mozilla Foundation Security Advisories patched:
- 2018-15/14
Download links. Setup: https://storage-waterfox.netdna-ssl.com/releases/win64/installer/Waterfox 56.2.2 Setup.exe
Portable: https://storage-waterfox.netdna-ssl...table/WaterfoxPortable_56.2.2_English.paf.exe