No. webroot is betterIs webroot more bad protectionwise than Panda?
No. webroot is betterIs webroot more bad protectionwise than Panda?
He takes the machine gun approach to execution and then complains when the AV is slow to process threats or his whole system crashes. See my above post ^.
You're right here. I think more testers (from different regions) means better and more thorough tests. I hope we see more testers in the hub soon.It's difficult all the testers post their results at the same time, different time regions, different free time to test, etc...
Well, we can donate because I appreciate what they do and I hope they keep the good work. I believe moderators at MT should encourage and invite more members to join the hub.I'm sure if we paid them properly for their work we might be able to work something out that is more consistent.
I’d like to learn to test in the hub when my baby is a bit older. I’d do it now, but time is at a premium. If I could switch careers it would definitely be into Infosec.Well, we can donate because I appreciate what they do and I hope they keep the good work. I believe moderators at MT should encourage and invite more members to join the hub.
I wonder how would MT look when your baby is old enoughbaby is a bit older
That’s a good question. 18 months can be a big change. And thank you.I wonder how would MT look when your baby is old enoughMay Allah bless your baby and grant him good health
I doubt many people have 32GB of RAM. I've got 12GB in my main computer (and less in all my others) and for the average user, 8GB is more than enough, unless they have many browser tabs open at once. In any case, lightness is not related to high CPU and/or disk usage, and not RAM usage.Light on resources is good but come on we now have 4c/ 8t, 6c/ 12t, 8 /16, 16/32....32/64... processing Power and most have 16Gb ram if not 32...my point is they are concentrating on the wrong thing... sacrificing the most important thing " prevention and protection" .