Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Other security for Windows, Mac, Linux
What antivirus is best for offline scanning?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DDE_Server" data-source="post: 918464" data-attributes="member: 65727"><p>I completely agree with [USER=36157]@mlnevese[/USER] point of view. i am already using similar setup on my personal laptop right now even before reading [USER=78686]@SeriousHoax[/USER] reply in which he explaining the new approach of kaspersky to migrate part of the signature updates to their cloud and separate their definitions according to type/category of infection. i am using simple combo "kaspersky cloud free + vodoo shield in smart mode + Adguard". i think using KS+vodooshield i.e "Cloud based + default deny solution" would be suitable.</p><p>the protection scenario which is the best in my opinion:</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">in case internet connection is available, you could put vodooshield in smart mode and depend on kaspersky as your first line of defense.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">in case no internet connection, just keep kaspersky active and put in vodooshield in "always on mode "but need more technical user . </li> </ol></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DDE_Server, post: 918464, member: 65727"] I completely agree with [USER=36157]@mlnevese[/USER] point of view. i am already using similar setup on my personal laptop right now even before reading [USER=78686]@SeriousHoax[/USER] reply in which he explaining the new approach of kaspersky to migrate part of the signature updates to their cloud and separate their definitions according to type/category of infection. i am using simple combo "kaspersky cloud free + vodoo shield in smart mode + Adguard". i think using KS+vodooshield i.e "Cloud based + default deny solution" would be suitable. the protection scenario which is the best in my opinion: [LIST=1] [*]in case internet connection is available, you could put vodooshield in smart mode and depend on kaspersky as your first line of defense. [*]in case no internet connection, just keep kaspersky active and put in vodooshield in "always on mode "but need more technical user . [/LIST] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top