- May 19, 2016
- 1,580
Hello,
I cannot find the answer alone on the forum
What are the engines used by HitmanPro ?
@Erik Loman
I cannot find the answer alone on the forum
What are the engines used by HitmanPro ?
@Erik Loman
Please provide comments and solutions that are helpful to the author of this topic.
Kaspersky,Bitdefender and it's own engine.Hello,
I cannot find the answer alone on the forum
What are the engines used by HitmanPro ?
@Erik Loman
I believe its now, Kaspersky , Bitdefender and SophosKaspersky,Bitdefender and it's own engine.
You are probably right about Sophos!I believe its now, Kaspersky , Bitdefender and Sophos
Kaspersky,Bitdefender and it's own engine.
I believe its now, Kaspersky , Bitdefender and Sophos
Also their website have changedYou are probably right about Sophos!
Thanks!!
Kaspersky, Bitdefender, Sophos and HitmanPro forensic engine
it uses the kaspersky security network, bitdefender secure cloud and sophos cloud for signatures and the HMP forensic tool hunts down suspicious looking files and scans them in the cloud using those 3 cloud databases. Although Personally I would use the Trend Micro smart protection network over BD secure cloudHi! May I ask a questions ? When you say kasper for example , what version you mean ? KIS or for example kasper rescue disk? Or all the versions as the same engine ?
I presume it's the signature detection engine of Kaspersky.Hi! May I ask a questions ? When you say kasper for example , what version you mean ? KIS or for example kasper rescue disk? Or all the versions as the same engine ?
I ask because I realise that if Hitman already use kasper engine, maybe it is useless to use kasper as removal tool ( I wrote removal tool, I now kasper , like others , ha many other settings / tools of protection )
You can say that HMP is comparable to ZAM/ZAL due to their use of multiple engines to detect through on-demand scanning. Of course, their in-house engines are the ones different.Yeah then I edited , I should have said detection tool.
So it is not the same to run Hitman or all the other AV .
( not contesting Hitman reliability, just understanding how things work... This is the same for all others product that use also other signature databases)
Thank you
the main difference is that you dont have to register for a 14 days trial of zam to remove threats you can use the scan and remove feature for as long as you like unlike the geniuses over at HMPYou can say that HMP is comparable to ZAM/ZAL
@Erik LomanKaspersky, Bitdefender, Sophos and HitmanPro forensic engine
Zemana made a clone of HMP.You can say that HMP is comparable to ZAM/ZAL due to their use of multiple engines to detect through on-demand scanning. Of course, their in-house engines are the ones different.
I purchased a license thinking zam was an inhouse product, although i was a little suspect at how it changes color when it finds something...Think about giving support to companies that work like that.
Makes sense seeing how secret they keep their engines, it would be a big tell tale sign. WowZemana made a clone of HMP.
ZAM v1 was a rebrand of HMP (they sold our HMP with a different UI we made for them).
Zemana then made an almost 1:1 copy of HMP with ZAM v2 without informing us. They even admitted to this fact:
Zemana AntiMalware 2 BETA
Think about giving support to companies that work like that.
Thanks @Erik LomanKaspersky, Bitdefender, Sophos and HitmanPro forensic engine
You do realize that HMPA is more of an Anti-exe / Anti Exploit and thats explains the no cloud approach.I wonder why HMP.A doesn't have real-time cloud scanning/protection like zemana premium? Any technical limitation or is it prone to false positives?
If HMP.A has this, it will help a lot to strengthen other signature-based AVs