Kate_L in memoriam Thread author Verified Top Poster Well-known Jun 21, 2014 1,044 Aug 21, 2014 #1 What do you think it is the best for you ? Reactions: Oxygen, gin and yigido
WinAndLinuxTutorials Level 4 Verified Honorary Member Aug 23, 2011 2,291 Aug 23, 2014 #21 High detection rate with High FP, because I am the only one that uses my laptop. The high FP doesn't bother me too much because I barely download executable files these days, but I hate it when an absolutely harmless file is detected. Upvote 0 Downvote
High detection rate with High FP, because I am the only one that uses my laptop. The high FP doesn't bother me too much because I barely download executable files these days, but I hate it when an absolutely harmless file is detected.
I Ink Administrator Verified Jan 8, 2011 22,490 Aug 23, 2014 #22 Low FP increases product usability. Threat awareness or other prevention methods, are better than relying on your AV. Upvote 0 Downvote
Low FP increases product usability. Threat awareness or other prevention methods, are better than relying on your AV.
Prorootect Level 69 Verified Nov 5, 2011 5,855 Aug 23, 2014 #23 High detection (with false positive) are better choice to me .. Upvote 0 Downvote
Jaspion Level 17 Verified Jun 5, 2013 841 Aug 23, 2014 #24 This really depends on how you are going to use the scanner and/or the real-time protection. Not to mention personal preference, of course. Upvote 0 Downvote
This really depends on how you are going to use the scanner and/or the real-time protection. Not to mention personal preference, of course.