Battle What do you think is better for you ?

[Kate_L]

What do you think it is the best for you ?

 

[Oxygen]

I'd rather have low detection rather than seeing constant false positive pop-ups.

 

[yigido]

High detection with low FP

 

[gin]

Low detection with best BB

 

[RƎDSPYGENTLEMEN]

I can survive the false detections.

 

[software182]

i vote high detection with high false positivie, please don't asky me "why ?"

 

[Deleted member 178]

low detection because detection is a feature from the past age

 

[Jaspion]

If the heuristics is not too dumb, and the FPs are not too many, then I prefer high detection rates.

Cloud is great, don't get me wrong. It's great for data storage and syncing, it's great for streaming malware database updates, performing real-time online analysis and other security-related tasks, and et cetera. Right, but I just don't take internet connections for granted anywhere, so I like to have cloud stuff as complements, and very important ones, but I still like having local backups, local databases, local heuristic analysis, and so on, as well.

 

[Rahadian Putra]

For me..it's better having low detection with 0 false positive, false positive can somewhat make user confusing, especially for beginner or for anyone who really doesn't know about it.

 

[glasswitch]

Low detection and no false positives

 

[juhful]

Low and No!!!

 

[Cats-4_Owners-2]

Low & Low, for me. Hey!! That's also our littlest cat's name, LO LO (not pictured) which stands for Little Orange!!

 

[yigido]

low detection because detection is a feature from the past age

Why people blame Comodo about low detections ? What do you think ?

 

[King Alpha]

Low detection with no false positive!

 

[Arakasi]

I couldn't pick one.

Option #3 : High detection with extremely low false positive. www.eset.com

 

[FleischmannTV]

I agree with @Arakasi

Vendors with mediocre detection often have very high false positives and vice versa.

 

[Cats-4_Owners-2]

Why people blame Comodo about low detections ? What do you think ?

Could it be high false positives? I honestly don't know as, only from what I've read, Comodo is akin to a passion for fans whom love to tweak their settings in order to create an airtight sandboxed "Fortress of Solitude". Comodo has ever been a fascination for me as the very name Comodo gives rise to the definition of fandom; and, even as an interested bystander, I see a controversial software company, including users whom either passionately love or previously loved it, shepparded by a controversial founder admired by many while criticized by others.
So, imho, maybe some people blame Comodo because they were former devotees whom tore themselves away (following a bitter divorce) and found themselves attending the Church of ESET or the Temple of Avast (..or whichever name applies).

I agree with @Arakasi

Vendors with mediocre detection often have very high false positives and vice versa.

This completely challenges my thinking because it turns it over and onto it's head!

 

[Exterminator]

I can deal with FP's as long as it prevents me from being infected.No other choice so did not vote

 

[Myna]

FP is not at all a problem with me.
So I'd just go with high detection with high FP.

 

[Raider Red]

Same here...very rarely see a FP...give me high detection!