Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Microsoft Defender
What is your opinion about Microsoft Windows Defender (Windows 10)?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Evjl&#039;s Rain" data-source="post: 895852" data-attributes="member: 51905"><p>the problem is WD is always running by default so most users won't notice the difference between having an AV or not having one</p><p>also, many users tend to compare WD, which has no web filter, and other internet security suites, which has many features + web filter. Then, they state that the suites slow down their browsing/downloading speed => I believe this is so unfair</p><p>there is no way Kaspersky (for example) has faster browsing speed than WD. However, Kaspersky can be faster than WD after being tweaked and with web filter disabled (virtually nobody does that)</p><p></p><p>in fact, I have been installing windows on several machines, mostly on weak laptops + 5400rpm HDD. When I forgot to disable WD after installing windows (to install essential softwares), I always noticed it took significantly more time. Disabling WD reduced the installation time by half or 1/3.</p><p>By the way, almost all AVs do slow down our PC noticeably. The difference between PC with or without AV is huge, even with a light AV</p><p>That's why there are so many people enjoy using their PC free of any AV</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Evjl's Rain, post: 895852, member: 51905"] the problem is WD is always running by default so most users won't notice the difference between having an AV or not having one also, many users tend to compare WD, which has no web filter, and other internet security suites, which has many features + web filter. Then, they state that the suites slow down their browsing/downloading speed => I believe this is so unfair there is no way Kaspersky (for example) has faster browsing speed than WD. However, Kaspersky can be faster than WD after being tweaked and with web filter disabled (virtually nobody does that) in fact, I have been installing windows on several machines, mostly on weak laptops + 5400rpm HDD. When I forgot to disable WD after installing windows (to install essential softwares), I always noticed it took significantly more time. Disabling WD reduced the installation time by half or 1/3. By the way, almost all AVs do slow down our PC noticeably. The difference between PC with or without AV is huge, even with a light AV That's why there are so many people enjoy using their PC free of any AV [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top