- Aug 4, 2015
- 36
My question is simple. Between the BitDefender and the Avira engines present on 360 Total Security, which one would choose if you could only have one of them enabled? Which one do you prefer? Which one gives the best protection and which one has less impact on computer performance (i.e., CPU and RAM usage)?
I'm asking this question because I'm considering trying out 360 Total Security once again, but I think it's a bit of an overkill to use both third party engines. I mean, the default settings and engines should be fine for me. However, since 360 Total Security relies so much on cloud protection, I would feel more at peace if I knew that there was one last line of defense in the form of a traditional AV engine. Still, having both Avira and BitDefender enabled seems to be a waste of computer resources, thus I want to know your opinions.
I'm asking this question because I'm considering trying out 360 Total Security once again, but I think it's a bit of an overkill to use both third party engines. I mean, the default settings and engines should be fine for me. However, since 360 Total Security relies so much on cloud protection, I would feel more at peace if I knew that there was one last line of defense in the form of a traditional AV engine. Still, having both Avira and BitDefender enabled seems to be a waste of computer resources, thus I want to know your opinions.