For the use I make of my Windows laptop, BD Free is sufficient also because it is very effective and solid.
I think you could do with some help from CFW (CS settings) for some zero day protection maybe?It seems you will shoot me in the head when you know that I am running Webroot![]()
I am using NVT OSArmorI think you could do with some help from CFW (CS settings) for some zero day protection maybe?
Regards Eck![]()
You are using BD Free, but you're looking for ransomware protection. Bitdefender Internet Security provides excellent ransomware protection.?? I not understand...
MD and Avast have ransomware protection.You are using BD Free, but you're looking for ransomware protection. Bitdefender Internet Security provides excellent ransomware protection.
You are using BD Free, but you're looking for ransomware protection. Bitdefender Internet Security provides excellent ransomware protection.

MD and Avast have ransomware protection.
Comodo users—You're too flawless to take part in this thread—so sit back and watch our friends enjoying their lucky break!what would you add to it, to make it better, or more perfect?
He is already using BD, so it makes sense to upgrade. But I agree, Avast ransomware protection set to strict is very effective.MD and Avast have ransomware protection.
He is already using BD, so it makes sense to upgrade. But I agree, Avast ransomware protection set to strict is very effective.
Yes. I used to enable it on family devices. Very effective and light on system resourcesAlso, I believe Avast has a hardened mode option/setting for the general protection.
Equal to setting cloud protection level to "zero tolerance" and applying ASR rule "Block executable files from running unless they meet a prevalence, age, or trusted list criterion" to apply the zero tolerance to executables without motw.hardened mode
But I prefer AVG/Avast as you can manage all the settings without the need for any tools. Moreover, Avast/AVG is lighter on system resources (on my devices). Finally, I can add files to quarantine and submit them for analysis from within the settings.Equal to setting cloud protection level to "zero tolerance" and applying ASR rule "Block executable files from running unless they meet a prevalence, age, or trusted list criterion" to apply the zero tolerance to executables without motw.
Nothing irks me more PC wise, than paying for a program then being bothered by intrusive popups often to get more £'s from me, I must be fortunate as McAfee hasn't done that to me but did to a relative, I use often the basic level by choice, I understand your annoyance - As @Marko :) has said, AV's seem to be a dwindling market & to obtain revenue they shove unneeded extras at a user, vaporware usually.I've been using McAfee until now. Nothing should be added to this antivirus program. On the contrary, McAfee should finally stop displaying pop-ups for additional modules. Since McAfee has just started this nuisance again, I've deleted the program and am now using Microsoft Defender.
I add ASR rules using GP without tools.you can manage all the settings without the need for any tools
For me, MD is equally light, with faster launch of MPC-HC than Avast.Avast/AVG is lighter on system resources (on my devices)
Still using it? Wow. I did not know it still exists.MPC-HC
Actually it is faster then VLC with a much better UI and a better image output.Still using it? Wow. I did not know it still exists.
DudeHere's my take if I would add something to KASPERSKY....
Maybe Kaspersky's Detection + Eset's Optimization + BD VPN + AVG GUI for it's simplicity + Trend Micro's Cyber Army + Crowdstrike's Funding + K7's lifetime license
This is just a dream product that will never ever be produced.
And lastly I will add Comodo's Firewall.
That won't be a gold product without Comodo.