- Apr 1, 2015
- 483
I see mainly neutral news on Secureaplus. I personally think it is a great default deny white listing program that is easy to use with integrated virustotal uploads and helpful feedback when determining what unknown to open.
I know it may not be as advanced as some of the other anti-exes out there, but it seems to me...it should offer excellent protection for most malware. I coupled mine with Windows Defender w/ PUA enabled (Windows 10 x64 Pro). I have offline AV turned off in Secureaplus.
I find Secureaplus more simple to use than Voodooshield, Appguard, NVT, etc. I like white listing software over signature based/behavior protections.
I also know it doesn't have web based protections such as phishing, etc...but myself and my clients usually run either Ublock Origin or Adguard for Windows to handle most of that (these probably do a better job anyhow, coupled with Chrome's malware/phishing protection).
The Secureaplus team is updating the software quickly (.5 to 1 month update time frame). It can take sometimes 1-2 days for support to respond to forum posts, but that's not horrible.
My questions are:
1. Why not use it? What features is it lacking? (important features please, not the %.0001 issues that may arise by not having this such feature). Let's be realistic. We are not protecting a nuclear submarine server here.
2. Why do you like it?
Thanks!
I know it may not be as advanced as some of the other anti-exes out there, but it seems to me...it should offer excellent protection for most malware. I coupled mine with Windows Defender w/ PUA enabled (Windows 10 x64 Pro). I have offline AV turned off in Secureaplus.
I find Secureaplus more simple to use than Voodooshield, Appguard, NVT, etc. I like white listing software over signature based/behavior protections.
I also know it doesn't have web based protections such as phishing, etc...but myself and my clients usually run either Ublock Origin or Adguard for Windows to handle most of that (these probably do a better job anyhow, coupled with Chrome's malware/phishing protection).
The Secureaplus team is updating the software quickly (.5 to 1 month update time frame). It can take sometimes 1-2 days for support to respond to forum posts, but that's not horrible.
My questions are:
1. Why not use it? What features is it lacking? (important features please, not the %.0001 issues that may arise by not having this such feature). Let's be realistic. We are not protecting a nuclear submarine server here.
2. Why do you like it?
Thanks!
Last edited: