Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Game Of Thrones" data-source="post: 1109147" data-attributes="member: 23430">Bro, you totally need to rethink and do more research about how antiviruses work. there is no more signature detection like in the old days there are many technologies that are helping the signatures like fuzzy hashing, etc with enough samples and feeding them to machine learning and creating a core detection(eset calls this DNA detection) you can detect many variants and even heavily modified malware. Just look at how Eset performs in advanced malware detection tests using miter, fileless, and targeted attacks. you have to be good at engine development to detect and defend from this kind of malware which eset Kaspersky and Bitdefender in terms of home edition products are the kings of sophisticated attack detection. I encourage you to do some research, there are some good whitepapers and websites on the internet to start with. you can start with this link from the eset website <a href="https://www.eset.com/int/about/technology/" target="_blank">ESET multilayered cybersecurity technology</a>this shows why eset is good at detecting malware on execution actually one of the fastest, its memory scanner and other techs are working after the execution, and with the help of DNA and other techs they can detect malware at pre-execution and on-execution stages. This is why you see most of the time eset reacts to malware faster than Kaspersky because Kaspersky is now actually a behavior-based antivirus and this is why you see many post-execution detections from Kaspersky in advanced tests(miter attacks etc)((the execution stages: pre-execution , on-execution , post-execution)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Game Of Thrones, post: 1109147, member: 23430"] Bro, you totally need to rethink and do more research about how antiviruses work. there is no more signature detection like in the old days there are many technologies that are helping the signatures like fuzzy hashing, etc with enough samples and feeding them to machine learning and creating a core detection(eset calls this DNA detection) you can detect many variants and even heavily modified malware. Just look at how Eset performs in advanced malware detection tests using miter, fileless, and targeted attacks. you have to be good at engine development to detect and defend from this kind of malware which eset Kaspersky and Bitdefender in terms of home edition products are the kings of sophisticated attack detection. I encourage you to do some research, there are some good whitepapers and websites on the internet to start with. you can start with this link from the eset website [URL='https://www.eset.com/int/about/technology/']ESET multilayered cybersecurity technology[/URL] this shows why eset is good at detecting malware on execution actually one of the fastest, its memory scanner and other techs are working after the execution, and with the help of DNA and other techs they can detect malware at pre-execution and on-execution stages. This is why you see most of the time eset reacts to malware faster than Kaspersky because Kaspersky is now actually a behavior-based antivirus and this is why you see many post-execution detections from Kaspersky in advanced tests(miter attacks etc) ((the execution stages: pre-execution , on-execution , post-execution) [/QUOTE]

Verification