hi everyone.
i have a important question . Which is the best antivirus for heuristics and behavior block ?
help me plz .
i have a important question . Which is the best antivirus for heuristics and behavior block ?
help me plz .
hi everyone.
i have a important question . Which is the best antivirus for heuristics and behavior block ?
help me plz .
thanks a lot .every thing you say in true
. but i want know best behavior blocker antivirus . what is your choice ?
what one individual considers best, another will not.hi everyone.
i have a important question . Which is the best antivirus for heuristics and behavior block ?
help me plz .
what one individual considers best, another will not.
if you list exactly the name of the solutions you are considering, you will get some better results in terms of responses. On the actual list, avast and Norton are quite good in their own way. Ashampoo, ill say there are other solutions better. Others as in you listed, needs to be specific.
A consideration:
the basic/average user identifies all safety technology with the antivirus and then he is probably not interested in figuring out how work these protection mechanisms.
Obviously the line between AV and heuristic tecnology and BB, is very tenuous indeed many antivirus in circulation use these technologies. The only difference is that they use the term "heuristic detection", but it's the same management.
In general, these technologies detect malware that normal signatures based antivirus fail to recognize, generating a high number of false positives, however. And we know that we do not want to be bothered by unnecessary alarms.
So the technology is inserted directly into the classic antivirus products adjusting by default to not generate too many false positives therefore It is necessary some knowledge to calibrate all.
So I believe this technologies can't be so much decisive for all (basic/average) users as sentenced by manufacturers. Consider what a program takes place as it happens doesn't solve any of the issues left open by the normal antivirus and the point is that part of the attacks fails, but few others can have success.
Some manufacturers may try to convince you that all users need this technologies, but it's not entirely true.
barely got Fps with webroot ^^
When it comes to heuristics then the word 'best' is different cause it change from time to time unlike within signatures that can maintain; everything are basis on behavior which why the process needs thorough process and majority of AV's cannot reach the industry average.
Don't rely on that specific cases although Norton Sonar, Bitdefender AVC and few others can manage to prevent threats in reliable way; better yet don't rely too much. *
*Intended as secondary plan and usually HIPS when incorporate are depend on user interaction.