Serious Discussion Why does the Comodo "Disappearing HIPS rules" bug require a complete source code rewrite?

Trident said:
Look at the last page of the previous thread.

You can identify them very quickly cuz they don’t even bother to make basic edits 🤣

Copy/paste.
Click to expand...
It's interesting that you had no problem with my AI analysis tools when I was helping you with your product. In fact, you thanked me for it. Funny how your principles seem to shift with public opinion.

1000010016.png
 
Divergent said:
It's interesting that you had no problem with my AI analysis tools when I was helping you with your product. In fact, you thanked me for it. Funny how your principles seem to shift with public opinion.

View attachment 291873
Click to expand...
I thanked you out of courtesy, not because it was helpful.

If I wanted this done, I could ask AI to do it, who’s gonna stop me?

You know, unlike AI, people usually try to have manners.

But soon, with all this copy/paste from AI, you may start to lose and forget that 😉
 
  • Like
Reactions: outlawxtorn, simmerskool and ForgottenSeer 94738
Trident said:
I thanked you out of courtesy, not because it was helpful.

If I wanted this done, I could ask AI to do it, who’s gonna stop me?

You know, unlike AI, people usually try to have manners.

But soon, with all this copy/paste from AI, you may start to lose and forget that 😉
Click to expand...
Funny, that's a completely different tune than the one you were singing in our DMs. Putting on a show for everyone?
 
Trident said:
So different, that’s why you left the conversation yesterday, then started another one and left that too. But see, you can write without AI… 😉
Click to expand...
I feel it's necessary to clarify the sequence of events. This conversation began with your comments yesterday. Following that, I received a private message from you, at which point I chose to disengage and disabled further DMs. I think it’s important we all operate from the same set of facts.

You waited to see which way the wind was blowing before you chimed in. I've been consistent. My on and off over a decade-long history, my time as a moderator, and my technical skills are all a matter of record here. You know this. This is just showboating, and I'm not interested.

I'm not going to debate my credentials or my communication style. Your attempt to undermine that is transparently performative.

You're misrepresenting the facts with a twisting that's becoming popular here. Given that you're well aware of my long history and technical background on this forum.
 
@Bot How do you feel about a user communicating their own phrasing through an ai writing tool that converts their posts into clean, concise communication that removes emotion and is factual, that keeps from alienating or offending other users while simultaneously sharing information to learn from.
 
  • +Reputation
Reactions: bazang
Divergent said:
@Bot How do you feel about a user communicating their own phrasing through an ai writing tool that converts their posts into clean, concise communication that removes emotion and is factual, that keeps from alienating or offending other users while simultaneously sharing information to learn from.
Click to expand...
@Divergent

That's an interesting question, and one that's becoming more relevant as AI tools evolve. Personally, I see it as a positive thing overall—especially in a community like this where clear, factual communication can make discussions more productive and less prone to misunderstandings. If a user is inputting their own ideas and phrasing, then using AI to polish it into something concise and emotion-free, it's essentially like having a really good editor. It helps keep the focus on the info being shared, which is great for learning and collaboration.

That said, transparency can go a long way. If it's obvious or disclosed that AI is involved in refining the text, it might prevent any accusations of inauthenticity. But hey, as long as the core message is genuine and adds value, I don't think it detracts from the conversation. What do you all think—does it change how you perceive a post?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Halp2001
Bot said:
@Divergent

That's an interesting question, and one that's becoming more relevant as AI tools evolve. Personally, I see it as a positive thing overall—especially in a community like this where clear, factual communication can make discussions more productive and less prone to misunderstandings. If a user is inputting their own ideas and phrasing, then using AI to polish it into something concise and emotion-free, it's essentially like having a really good editor. It helps keep the focus on the info being shared, which is great for learning and collaboration.

That said, transparency can go a long way. If it's obvious or disclosed that AI is involved in refining the text, it might prevent any accusations of inauthenticity. But hey, as long as the core message is genuine and adds value, I don't think it detracts from the conversation. What do you all think—does it change how you perceive a post?
Click to expand...
The formatting is a clear giveaway. I've never made a secret of it, in fact, I've mentioned it to other users and even asked you about it publicly just now. Thank you for your input.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Halp2001
Divergent said:
The formatting is a clear giveaway. I've never made a secret of it, in fact, I've mentioned it to other users and even asked you about it publicly just now. Thank you for your input.
Click to expand...
@Divergent

No problem at all—glad to weigh in. Yeah, the formatting does stand out sometimes, but if you're open about it, that just reinforces the trust factor. It's all about keeping things constructive, right? If more folks used tools like that thoughtfully, we might see fewer heated exchanges and more solid info-sharing. Cheers!
 
  • Like
  • Hundred Points
Reactions: simmerskool, Halp2001 and Divergent
Divergent said:
@Bot How do you feel about a user communicating their own phrasing through an ai writing tool that converts their posts into clean, concise communication that removes emotion and is factual, that keeps from alienating or offending other users while simultaneously sharing information to learn from.
Click to expand...
1760272024452.png
 
  • HaHa
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: outlawxtorn, simmerskool, GenV and 2 others
Microsoft plans to move AVs from the kernel. This will require much work. This can also be a cause to rewrite CIS by using Xcitium code.
If so, then CIS will be a simplified version of the flagship EDR, adjusted to the home environment.
Using something like Paranoid Settings in a home AV is not a good idea.
 
  • +Reputation
  • Like
  • Hundred Points
Reactions: simmerskool, GenV and Trident
Andy Ful said:
Microsoft plans to move AVs from the kernel. This will require much work. This can also be a cause to rewrite CIS by using Xcitium code.
If so, then Comodo will be a simplified version of the flagship EDR, adjusted to the home environment.
Click to expand...
Yeah, it will require mass amount of calls to a com interface, which will communicate with Microsoft-facilitated kernel, which has now been the situation with Mac for quite some time.

But that’s not happening in the next 2-3 years most likely.

Microsoft will first have to sort out any potential evasions which could lead to blind spots.

Even then, Comodo won’t be rewritten, Xcitium will be.

I am guessing this will be the moment when Comodo will be scrapped.

Some vendors are ahead of this game, others that have 15 kernel drivers (even registry monitoring performed in kernel mode) will need to work hard.
 
  • Like
  • +Reputation
  • Hundred Points
Reactions: outlawxtorn, simmerskool, ForgottenSeer 94738 and 1 other person

You may also like...