Menu
Forums
New posts
News feed
Latest activity
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Hardware News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
MalwareTips Giveaways
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Malware Hub
Malware Samples
Statistics and Reports
Blogs
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
Security Discussions
General Security Questions
Why I think testing "labs" are useless
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="monkeylove" data-source="post: 883276" data-attributes="member: 19756"><p>I don't see much sense in claims that "my PC has never been infected for years" because people use computers differently. Neither do I see the point in arguing that something that a program is either the best or "garbage."</p><p></p><p>That said, I look at tests because it's better than nothing, and what I'm looking for isn't what's "garbage" or not but what provides the best protection without affecting performance that much.</p><p></p><p>With that, I select free versions of the programs with the best protection given different tests, and then I do the ff.</p><p></p><p>1. I remove the ones that have popup notifications for upgrades or notifications that can't be disabled;</p><p></p><p>2. I install each one and see which slows down the PC the least;</p><p></p><p>3. From there, I select one which has the most features and use it for all PCs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="monkeylove, post: 883276, member: 19756"] I don't see much sense in claims that "my PC has never been infected for years" because people use computers differently. Neither do I see the point in arguing that something that a program is either the best or "garbage." That said, I look at tests because it's better than nothing, and what I'm looking for isn't what's "garbage" or not but what provides the best protection without affecting performance that much. With that, I select free versions of the programs with the best protection given different tests, and then I do the ff. 1. I remove the ones that have popup notifications for upgrades or notifications that can't be disabled; 2. I install each one and see which slows down the PC the least; 3. From there, I select one which has the most features and use it for all PCs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top