Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
Why I think testing "labs" are useless
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Burrito" data-source="post: 883721" data-attributes="member: 72439"><p>And that is very kind and diplomatic speculation. Some testing labs actually bent over backwards to try to accommodate Webroot. Even though it's invalid, Webroot was part of the impetus to start the "Detected in 24 hours" category. Of course, in that 24 hours, your info has already been stolen, your bitcoin bank is emptied..</p><p></p><p>This is what PCMag says about the Labs as it relates to their reviews:</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]240570[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>But of course... there is a problem. Nothing gets crushed like Webroot in all the labs. So it appears that PCMag has a disconnect somewhere.</p><p></p><p>I won't totally diss PCMag, as they did recognize the greatness of VooDoo. So they got that going for them.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]240571[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well uh.... yeah Dan. Of course Burrito is right. Who would even ponder otherwise... <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, this is it. You go Dan..</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>One would think. Especially from somebody like you... a divergent thinker with a fresh approach.</p><p></p><p>Do you think you should join AMTSO?</p><p></p><p>At the last AMTSO meeting, the first item on the agenda was: </p><p></p><p><em>1. Why does VooDoo Dan not like us? **</em></p><p></p><p></p><p>Thanks VooDoo Dan.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]240572[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 9px">**Not Really</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Burrito, post: 883721, member: 72439"] And that is very kind and diplomatic speculation. Some testing labs actually bent over backwards to try to accommodate Webroot. Even though it's invalid, Webroot was part of the impetus to start the "Detected in 24 hours" category. Of course, in that 24 hours, your info has already been stolen, your bitcoin bank is emptied.. This is what PCMag says about the Labs as it relates to their reviews: [ATTACH type="full" width="506px"]240570[/ATTACH] But of course... there is a problem. Nothing gets crushed like Webroot in all the labs. So it appears that PCMag has a disconnect somewhere. I won't totally diss PCMag, as they did recognize the greatness of VooDoo. So they got that going for them. [ATTACH type="full" width="536px"]240571[/ATTACH] Well uh.... yeah Dan. Of course Burrito is right. Who would even ponder otherwise... ;) Yeah, this is it. You go Dan.. One would think. Especially from somebody like you... a divergent thinker with a fresh approach. Do you think you should join AMTSO? At the last AMTSO meeting, the first item on the agenda was: [I]1. Why does VooDoo Dan not like us? **[/I] Thanks VooDoo Dan. [ATTACH type="full" width="97px"]240572[/ATTACH] [SIZE=1]**Not Really[/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top