Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Emsisoft
Windows and Office Genuine ISO Verifier detected by Emsisoft BB
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Divine_Barakah" data-source="post: 1098789" data-attributes="member: 79770"><p>But it generates a considerable amount of FPs.</p><p></p><p>I most of the time receive alerts when installing almost any software, but most of the time AntiMalware Network steps in and allows the installation. </p><p></p><p>I believe Emsisoft should allow the submission of hashes during detection to help with FPs. It is very inconvenient to submit quarantined files and wait for support, even if support is relatively fast. </p><p></p><p>I know I can always add detections to exclusion, but I believe this should not be up to the user because there is the possibility that the detection is correct and not a FP. This is why I prefer BD. First, it has a larger user base and the product itself seems to be more intelligent. Moreover, it requires zero interaction from the end user. I know BD also generates some FPs, but way lesser than Emsisoft does.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Divine_Barakah, post: 1098789, member: 79770"] But it generates a considerable amount of FPs. I most of the time receive alerts when installing almost any software, but most of the time AntiMalware Network steps in and allows the installation. I believe Emsisoft should allow the submission of hashes during detection to help with FPs. It is very inconvenient to submit quarantined files and wait for support, even if support is relatively fast. I know I can always add detections to exclusion, but I believe this should not be up to the user because there is the possibility that the detection is correct and not a FP. This is why I prefer BD. First, it has a larger user base and the product itself seems to be more intelligent. Moreover, it requires zero interaction from the end user. I know BD also generates some FPs, but way lesser than Emsisoft does. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
