Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Windows Defender vs Top 100 Infostealers
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vitali Ortzi" data-source="post: 1111383" data-attributes="member: 57714"><p>The av used for detection are more aggressive</p><p>Norton power eraser uses more aggressive huristics then max settings on Symantec and uses some that are exclusive to the scanner (Symantec diagnostics , Norton power eraser is on purpose built to find as much malware as possible)</p><p>Hitman pro is far more aggressive then sophos too</p><p>Obviously they would detect more and have more false positives then defender</p><p>With 100 samples I'm sure the super aggressive scanners would get better results so what as they aren't a realtime av for obvious reasons and if he tested sophos , Norton consumer products on default settings they should miss some samples just like defender</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>"Power Eraser scans and virus and spyware scans both run an active scan and a full scan.</p><p>However, Power Eraser uses the more aggressive High Intensity Detection (HID) scans that employ advanced machine learning (AML) techniques. The AML engine determines if a file is good or bad through a learning process.</p><p>The AML engine recognizes malicious attributes and defines the rules that the AML engine uses to make detectio</p><p>ns."</p><p>Source </p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://techdocs.broadcom.com/us/en/symantec-security-software/endpoint-security-and-management/endpoint-protection/all/troubleshooting-v58233805-d77e6/what-you-should-know-before-you-run-power-eraser-f-v81592564-d67e6.html[/URL]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vitali Ortzi, post: 1111383, member: 57714"] The av used for detection are more aggressive Norton power eraser uses more aggressive huristics then max settings on Symantec and uses some that are exclusive to the scanner (Symantec diagnostics , Norton power eraser is on purpose built to find as much malware as possible) Hitman pro is far more aggressive then sophos too Obviously they would detect more and have more false positives then defender With 100 samples I'm sure the super aggressive scanners would get better results so what as they aren't a realtime av for obvious reasons and if he tested sophos , Norton consumer products on default settings they should miss some samples just like defender "Power Eraser scans and virus and spyware scans both run an active scan and a full scan. However, Power Eraser uses the more aggressive High Intensity Detection (HID) scans that employ advanced machine learning (AML) techniques. The AML engine determines if a file is good or bad through a learning process. The AML engine recognizes malicious attributes and defines the rules that the AML engine uses to make detectio ns." Source [URL unfurl="true"]https://techdocs.broadcom.com/us/en/symantec-security-software/endpoint-security-and-management/endpoint-protection/all/troubleshooting-v58233805-d77e6/what-you-should-know-before-you-run-power-eraser-f-v81592564-d67e6.html[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top