Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Decopi" data-source="post: 879591" data-attributes="member: 67091">[USER=76851]@WiseVector[/USER] thanks for your answer.For the last 12 months I&#039;ve been testing Cylance (HE) and AhnLab etc. And now my intention is to start testing WV (since February I was waiting for the announced v2.6). I presume v2.6 finally makes WV enough mature and ready to be compared to its peers.Cylance (HE) and AhnLab, both have their pros and cons, but both are very lightweight.However, WV is even more lightweight (-50% system resources than Cylance and AhnLab). Quiet impressive. Congrats.After uninstalling and reinstalling WV days ago, I haven&#039;t seen again the issue related to high CPU/RAM use.So now I believe I can focus on protection tests. For several months I followed here some tests and testers. It&#039;s time to make my own tests... let&#039;s see what WV can do (compared to Cylance and AhnLab).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Decopi, post: 879591, member: 67091"] [USER=76851]@WiseVector[/USER] thanks for your answer. For the last 12 months I've been testing Cylance (HE) and AhnLab etc. And now my intention is to start testing WV (since February I was waiting for the announced v2.6). I presume v2.6 finally makes WV enough mature and ready to be compared to its peers. Cylance (HE) and AhnLab, both have their pros and cons, but both are very lightweight. However, WV is even more lightweight (-50% system resources than Cylance and AhnLab). Quiet impressive. Congrats. After uninstalling and reinstalling WV days ago, I haven't seen again the issue related to high CPU/RAM use. So now I believe I can focus on protection tests. For several months I followed here some tests and testers. It's time to make my own tests... let's see what WV can do (compared to Cylance and AhnLab). [/QUOTE]

Verification