Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="SomeRandomCat" data-source="post: 922738" data-attributes="member: 90137"><p>They stated on their own that they plan to implement Firewall (and some HIPS) features.&nbsp; All of us commenting are trying to learn information about how these features will be implemented, and give our feedback on them.&nbsp; I do agree with you about the &#039;jack of all trades, master of none&#039; thing though, which is why I&#039;m asking so many questions and making so many suggestions.&nbsp; If they implement everything properly, it would complement what they already have, but it would indeed be very poor choice for them to make if they cannot maintain and continue developing their core features.&nbsp; Any FW/HIPS features suit anti-malware really good, if done right.&nbsp; It does seem that they are trying to keep the default configuration simple, so you would probably not have an issue with their feature upgrades as long as they had proper quality control.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="SomeRandomCat, post: 922738, member: 90137"] They stated on their own that they plan to implement Firewall (and some HIPS) features. All of us commenting are trying to learn information about how these features will be implemented, and give our feedback on them. I do agree with you about the 'jack of all trades, master of none' thing though, which is why I'm asking so many questions and making so many suggestions. If they implement everything properly, it would complement what they already have, but it would indeed be very poor choice for them to make if they cannot maintain and continue developing their core features. Any FW/HIPS features suit anti-malware really good, if done right. It does seem that they are trying to keep the default configuration simple, so you would probably not have an issue with their feature upgrades as long as they had proper quality control. [/QUOTE]

Verification