does this software have a good 0-day protection, a decent HIPS or something similar that improves the protection from the main AV?
Also, if it's for the engine, I believe ZAM is better
HMP.A (which includes HMP as a scanner) is also better.
Does HitmanPro.Alert indeed now include HitmanPro as a realtime scanner and not just an on-demand scanner?

It's not much of a contradiction. IObit Uninstaller is excellent (although I usually use Comodo Programs Manager these days) and IMF is average at best. But, they're both doing completely different things, so you can't really compare them in my opinion.Some say they use IObit Uninstaller and find it good but wouldn't trust in IObit Malware Fighter protecting their systems. Contradictions are real. :X3:![]()
I didn't know that, I haven't used Zemana for a while. Good to know.I had to be away from Malware Tips awhile recently. But before I was gone, the last thing I was hearing here about ZAM was that they had dropped the multiple engines and that the quality of the product was vastly down. If that has reversed, I would be glad to hear it, because I have a ZAM license.
My 2c: I don't run any companion AV in my PC, and I don't think they are really necessary. But if I did, why would I choose a real time scanner? One Antivirus isn't good enough? A real time scanner... with Avira engine?Does HitmanPro.Alert indeed now include HitmanPro as a realtime scanner and not just an on-demand scanner?
I was talking about using different products from same company, one is good, and other is questionable. The question was how can there be such difference in quality. As an example, all Kaspersky products are more or less same quality and you can trust them. But IObit products? Same is with the Malware Hunter Pro from Gary Utilities.But, they're both doing completely different things, so you can't really compare them in my opinion.