Zemana anti-malware vs Malwarebytes

[taga]

Hi Guys,

Could I please get some expert advice whether I need to use both Zemana anti-malware and Malwarebytes 3.0?.

Is Zemana anti-malware and Malwarebytes 3.0 the same or different?, which software's more better for internet security?

 

[ispx]

you can have them both. they will work in tandem. zemana is way better than malwarebytes if you ask me.

if you have not bought zemana anti-malware yet, i would advice you to buy zemana anti-logger instead. zal + mbam will be real good.

 

[Cohen]

I would choose Zemana Anti-Malware (or better yet, Anti-Logger) over Malwarebytes.
In my experience, Zemana was lighter on my system than Malwarebytes was. If I remember correctly, Zemana also uses multiple AV engines for its scans.

 

[DeepWeb]

Zemana all the way.

 

[jerzy601]

I used MBAM Premium for some time but he came back to Zemana Anti-Malware is lighter and uses more engines to scan the system.
Also in my opinion it's better Zeman but the choice belongs to you.

 

[frogboy]

100% ZAM for me, MB ain't what it used to be that is for sure.

 

[Atlas147]

Zemana has a better detection rate than malwarebytes for sure, but even zemana has some pros and cons. If you don't already have an AV, I suggest choosing one to make it your main AV.

Zemana and Malwarebytes are both companion AVs and can work along side a main AV (even though malwarebytes has stated they are officially calling themselves an AV, their detection rate is still questionable)

 

[Fritz]

I got 66 days left on 4 Malwarebytes Anti-Malware licenses. Currently, I don't even have it installed. Since they just had to fix what wasn't broken in the first place, I'll go for Zemana next time around.

 

[KevinYu0504]

@taga

Go take a look here , should help for you
Q&A - Malwarebytes 3 and Zemana AntiLogger - Any conflicts?