Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Other security for Windows, Mac, Linux
ZoneAlarm by Check Point Info, Guides, Tests
Message
<blockquote data-quote="simmerskool" data-source="post: 1043830" data-attributes="member: 61091"><p>[USER=67091]@Decopi[/USER], we seem to mostly agree. I would prefer that ZA block that sneaky 65mb stealer malware without the user having to throw a switch in firewall. That's my only point. Why do I want to install an AV with default reduced protection, and then have to tweak it for max protection? (perhaps there's something I'm missing <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite132" alt=":unsure:" title="Unsure :unsure:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":unsure:" />) I assume ZA is configuring it features to max protection as default since ZA has nothing to tweak. If it failed with that 65mb malware, ZA should fix that by default without user needing to tweak its firewall. (aside if I want to tweak a firewall, then I run CF@cs).</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]276052[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>no events here after continuously running ZA for +4.7 days. have not DL'd eicar yet. The few ZA popups generated have been this file is good, or this is not phishing site which are unobtrusive.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="simmerskool, post: 1043830, member: 61091"] [USER=67091]@Decopi[/USER], we seem to mostly agree. I would prefer that ZA block that sneaky 65mb stealer malware without the user having to throw a switch in firewall. That's my only point. Why do I want to install an AV with default reduced protection, and then have to tweak it for max protection? (perhaps there's something I'm missing :unsure:) I assume ZA is configuring it features to max protection as default since ZA has nothing to tweak. If it failed with that 65mb malware, ZA should fix that by default without user needing to tweak its firewall. (aside if I want to tweak a firewall, then I run CF@cs). [ATTACH type="full" width="641px" alt="1686396488738.png"]276052[/ATTACH] no events here after continuously running ZA for +4.7 days. have not DL'd eicar yet. The few ZA popups generated have been this file is good, or this is not phishing site which are unobtrusive. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top