Question AirVPN or Mullvad + ControlD

Please provide comments and solutions that are helpful to the author of this topic.

Which would you get, with cost being a factor?

  • AirVPN

    Votes: 3 25.0%
  • Mullvad + ControlD

    Votes: 9 75.0%

  • Total voters
    12

n8chavez

Level 25
Thread author
Well-known
Feb 26, 2021
1,430
2
3,917
2,368
42
It's time to renew Mullvad. I've been thinking about something that I feel is interesting I've been considering AirVPN, especially since right now it's on sale for $85 USD for 36 months. There is a lot to like about AirVPN. But there's a lot to like about Mullvad too. Here's my thought process.

Cost:
  1. If I stay with Mullvad I also need need to continue a subscription to ControlD since Mullvad's DNS blocking list are not very strong.
  2. Mullvad is about $6 USD per month, ControlD is about $2 USD
  3. AirVPN is one sale for $85 USD for 36 months, equaling roughly $2.40 USD per month. ControlD is not needed since AirVPN allows for better blocking lists and allows for costum blocks and exclusions.
Mullvad + ControlD = $8 USD per month
AirVPN = $2.40 USD per month with the current sale

Security:

  1. Neither Mullvad or AirVPN keep logs. Mullvad has this third party verified, whereas AirVPN does not believe in testing. Both Mullvad and AirVPN have had servers seized, on which no logs where able to be found.
  2. Mullvad has Switzerland jurisdiction, AirVPN has Italian jurisdiction. Neither is ideal, but irrelevant is no logs are ever kept.
  3. Both Mullvad and AirVPN use RAM-only servers, including DNS
  4. Mullvad owns some of its own European servers, whereas AirVPN only rents. Irrelevant to me, as I am not there.
  5. Mullvad uses socks5-through-VPN, AirVPN does not. But AirVPN given users a static local IP, allowing for firewall rules that can create a secondary killswitch.
Which would you chose? Why?
 
It's time to renew Mullvad. I've been thinking about something that I feel is interesting I've been considering AirVPN, especially since right now it's on sale for $85 USD for 36 months. There is a lot to like about AirVPN. But there's a lot to like about Mullvad too. Here's my thought process.

Cost:
  1. If I stay with Mullvad I also need need to continue a subscription to ControlD since Mullvad's DNS blocking list are not very strong.
  2. Mullvad is about $6 USD per month, ControlD is about $2 USD
  3. AirVPN is one sale for $85 USD for 36 months, equaling roughly $2.40 USD per month. ControlD is not needed since AirVPN allows for better blocking lists and allows for costum blocks and exclusions.
Mullvad + ControlD = $8 USD per month
AirVPN = $2.40 USD per month with the current sale

Security:

  1. Neither Mullvad or AirVPN keep logs. Mullvad has this third party verified, whereas AirVPN does not believe in testing. Both Mullvad and AirVPN have had servers seized, on which no logs where able to be found.
  2. Mullvad has Switzerland jurisdiction, AirVPN has Italian jurisdiction. Neither is ideal, but irrelevant is no logs are ever kept.
  3. Both Mullvad and AirVPN use RAM-only servers, including DNS
  4. Mullvad owns some of its own European servers, whereas AirVPN only rents. Irrelevant to me, as I am not there.
  5. Mullvad uses socks5-through-VPN, AirVPN does not. But AirVPN given users a static local IP, allowing for firewall rules that can create a secondary killswitch.
Which would you chose? Why?
If the choice is strictly between those two, I would lean toward Mullvad for trust/transparency and AirVPN for price/custom DNS-style filtering value.

Important correction

Mullvad is not under Swiss jurisdiction. Mullvad is based in Sweden. AirVPN is based in Italy. That does not automatically make one unsafe, but it is worth keeping the facts straight before comparing them.

How I would frame the decision

  • Choose Mullvad if your top priority is:
    • Independent audits / external verification
    • A very strong transparency reputation
    • A simpler, more conservative setup
    • Confidence in the provider over extra features
  • Choose AirVPN if your top priority is:
    • Lower long-term cost
    • More configuration flexibility
    • Better built-in filtering options for your use case
    • Getting rid of a separate ControlD subscription

On the security side

A few of your points are reasonable, but I would be careful with absolute statements.

  • “No logs” claims: Mullvad has the stronger public verification position because of independent audits and broader transparency documentation. AirVPN has a long-standing privacy-focused reputation, but that is not the same as third-party verification.
  • Server seizures: Past incidents can support a provider’s claims, but they still do not prove every part of the infrastructure is perfect at all times.
  • Jurisdiction: It is not irrelevant, even with a no-logs design. Good technical design reduces risk, but legal environment, company transparency, and operational practices still matter.
  • RAM-only infrastructure: If both providers currently document this for relevant systems, that is a positive, but infrastructure details can change over time and should be checked from official documentation before treating them as a deciding fact.

What stands out most here

Your comparison really looks like trust premium vs value premium.

With Mullvad, you are paying more for a provider that is generally viewed as one of the more transparent and independently scrutinized VPNs.

With AirVPN, you are paying much less and getting more tuning flexibility, which may make the total package more attractive if DNS filtering is important to you.

What I would personally prioritize as an AI evaluating the tradeoff

  1. Transparency and independent verification
  2. Clear documentation of infrastructure and policies
  3. Whether the extra filtering features actually replace your need for ControlD
  4. Long-term pricing only after the first three points are satisfied

By that order, Mullvad comes out ahead on trust and verification.

By total cost and customization, AirVPN comes out ahead.

Practical conclusion

If you want the safer conservative pick, I would choose Mullvad.

If you have already decided that custom filtering is essential and you are comfortable accepting less external verification in exchange for much lower cost, AirVPN is the more economical choice.

So my answer would be:

  • Mullvad for strongest confidence in the provider itself
  • AirVPN for best price-to-features ratio in your specific setup

Based on the factors you listed, Mullvad is the stronger security-first choice, while AirVPN is the stronger budget/value choice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sorrento
I guess the thing that even has me questioning is that certain Mullvad servers I use are no blocked by Youtube and Reddit and now require login to use. In my mind, logging in and leaving a trail (such that it is) kind of defeats the purpose of a VPN from a privacy standpoint. AirVPN does not have these issues; it does not block services.
 
Maybe a dumb question: why do you need a VPN?

For security: it is only marketing
For privacy: hiding IP has limited effect on device and browser fingerprinting

I reboot my ISP modem and my router every day (with a simple clock timer disconnecting it from AC power and keeping it off line for four hours, using the reboot/downtime schedule of my router to give the modem 10 minutes headstart). Because my ISP uses dynamic IP allocation, I usually get different IP's (and in 2/3 of the reboots also switch IP location between 4 cities in the Netherlands).
 
Last edited:
Why would you not use one? I mean, it's kind of dumb not to. Do you trust your ISP that much? Have you never had your information scraped and sold? Think of a VPN like birth control. It's dumb to not use it.
Using a different DNS (ControlD in your case) and HTTPS/DOH means your ISP does not has much to sniff at.

I was an Avast forum member whose email and password is a known leak (Avast forum breached in 2014). Recently my my mobile provider was breached (link) and I am getting heaps of SPAM. How would a VPN prevent that?
 
Last edited:
I've used Air quite a bit in the past, my gripe is how slow the speed is & for me that is a massively huge factor, which is why Mullvad would be my choice, I think Air need to realise users are now using fast internet, it was November time I last used Air & that's probably the last chance they got with me just my 10 pence worth?
 
Maybe a dumb question: why do you need a VPN?

For security: it is only marketing
For privacy: hiding IP has limited effect on device and browser fingerprinting

I reboot my ISP modem and my router every day (with a simple clock timer disconnecting it from AC power and keeping it off line for four hours, using the reboot/downtime schedule of my router to give the modem 10 minutes headstart). Because my ISP uses dynamic IP allocation, I usually get different IP's (and in 2/3 of the reboots also switch IP location between 4 cities in the Netherlands).

My case with my ISP is simple, they are transparent in the fact they will sell your data & in the UK have to save your data, I'm no privacy freak but for me that is why I use a VPN & in my case again I find little or no reason not to use one, also each site I connect to does not know where I live, for me its worth it as it makes virtually no difference, & at the moment I really like some of Nords add-ons, but I'd use one anyway - I never use my main email for any forums etc.

Edit: IVPN are quite clear about what a VPN can & cannot do & they are really honest but there is a blog regarding your ISP & its IMO worth a read:

10 Questions For Your ISP
 
Last edited:
My case with my ISP is simple, they are transparent in the fact they will sell your data & in the UK have to save your data, I'm no privacy freak but for me that is why I use a VPN & in my case again I find little or no reason not to use one, also each site I connect to does not know where I live, for me its worth it as it makes virtually no difference, & at the moment I really like some of Nords add-ons, but I'd use one anyway - I never use my main email for any forums etc.

Edit: IVPN are quite clear about what a VPN can & cannot do & they are really honest but there is a blog regarding your ISP & its IMO worth a read:

10 Questions For Your ISP
Thanks I will have a look at it on my phone (using Quad9 as DNS) because I have a Cloudflare Zero Truct Policy blocking all stuff wanting to bypass (VPN) or access (P2P, remote access etc) my laptop
1773997003592.png

:)

But how would your ISP see what websites your are visiting ask AI
1773997336660.png
Quad9 (best), NextDNS (great) and ControlD (good) have privacy respecting policies and log retention periods
 
Last edited:
Amusing that it feels IVPN is a scammer, probably one of the most respected VPN's there has ever been, probably why I prefer a VPN to some DNS's are full of FP's so I just use the VPN DNS, in my case at moment Nord :):)
 
Last edited:
Amusing that it feels IVPN is a scammer, probably one of the most respected VPN's there has ever been, probably why I prefer a VPN to some DNS's which block FP's so I just use the VPN DNS, in my case at moment Nord :):)
I changed the text (that I setup a policy, not Cloudflare by default blocking VPN's) apologize for the misunderstanding
 
Amusing that it feels IVPN is a scammer, probably one of the most respected VPN's there has ever been, probably why I prefer a VPN to some DNS's are full of FP's so I just use the VPN DNS, in my case at moment Nord :):)

IVP has DNS optional blocking. They call it Anti-Tracker. It's Nord that's the worst. I wouldn't trust them for anything, or any VPN that relies on a huge marketing department. You know they own off the VPN "review" sites, right? No wonder they are always ranking highly.
 
They do have it, but it's not the same. Mullvad hasn't really shown any interest in making that feature useful. The filterlists they offer are a joke, to the point where users should use other services, like ControlD or NextDNS, instead. They really need to work on their DNS filtering.
 
I think ControlD is worth it. I have both IPV4 and DOH/DOH3 devices, each with their own rules and analytics. I pay $20 USD per year for full control. I mainly use it to block malware and bypass Geo restrictions for the like of BBC iPlayer.
 
Some VPN's to me seem to showing little or no interest in improving the product esp with the GUI, servers etc, IVPN thought they were giving you the world with a dark mode, then there are two tiers, the cheaper one is useless in 2026 as amazingly users have several devices... - AIR is virtually unchanged in years, it looks like lack of funding, and as more users are using VPN's at least in the UK to access restricted content its the big boys with IMO improvements users want that are getting the cash,.

A VPN in my opinion in the UK for example with one sever is about useless, if that server has an issue you are done, limited IP addresses is another if they are limited & blocked again there are issues - This was the case for me very much with OVPN a VPN I used for some time with a borderline useless (take it or leave it) support with a 'sorry that's the IP you have' that its blocked not much we can do, & it seems we really don't care.

With Nord with its issues (using an email is one) I can in two seconds have a different IP, another city here, or for not much £'s a static IP, investment in all things is the key or you are left behind? I really like Mullvad but as mentioned the DNS content blocking is about as much use as a chocolate fireguard & they really don't seem bothered which to me is getting typical among VPN's???