- Apr 15, 2019
- 119
This test shows how an antivirus behaves with certain threats, in a specific environment and under certain conditions.
We encourage you to compare these results with others and take informed decisions on what security products to use.
Before buying an antivirus you should consider factors such as price, ease of use, compatibility, and support. Installing a free trial version allows an antivirus to be tested in everyday use before purchase.
Panda protection rate 94,4% & kaspersky 99,97% wow theyre almost identical where it comes into protection! Kaspersky even has more false positives!
Wow im impressed ! im going to install panda right now!
Because of offline detectionIt's not almost identical in terms of protection...
In fact, Panda's 99.41% is the third worst result in this test. As a result, Panda only received one star overall, whereas Kaspersky is a three-star product.
sorry, but I will continue to use the security product I am using now, the only case that makes me replace it with another security product is failure in my own environment and not test environments that differ from one person to anotherThis test shows how an antivirus behaves with certain threats, in a specific environment and under certain conditions.
We encourage you to compare these results with others and take informed decisions on what security products to use.
Panda's performance strongly suggests the use of illicit substances or performance-enhancing drugs!Panda protection rate 94,4% & kaspersky 99,97% wow theyre almost identical where it comes into protection! Kaspersky even has more false positives!
Wow im impressed ! im going to install panda right now!
... but my real-life experience running FS with DeepGuard, I had very few false+ (perhaps it depends where you're surfing and downloading)... fwiwIt's a pity that F-Secure is unable to obtain certification due to too many FPs. I feel most FPs are produced by DeepGuard because it tends to block rare and new files.
what happened?GData is improving alot now a days, but i will never use it anymore.... too bad....
... or when you go to renew expiring license and AV charges you 3x$...sorry, but I will continue to use the security product I am using now, the only case that makes me replace it with another security product is failure in my own environment and not test environments that differ from one person to another
Yeah, in my testing, besides APC and other cloud-based detection (DeepGuard has been nicely integrated with APC and F-S’s own cloud) and behavioral detection, a majority of the DeepGuard detections is just because the application is rare. I’m sure there is an algorithm and whitelisting system in place to reduce FPs, because not all rare applications are blocked by DeepGuard. However due to geographical footprint, in some regions, DeepGuard produced a lot of FPs.... but my real-life experience running FS with DeepGuard, I had very few false+ (perhaps it depends where you're surfing and downloading)... fwiw
Too many small bugs, lousy interface, no support etc.what happened?