AV-Comparatives:Real-World Protection Tests March to June 2014

[Petrovic]

http://www.av-comparatives.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/avc_prot_2014a_en.pdf

 

[FreddyFreeloader]

Anybody believe any of this stuff?

 

[rebel4life]

nope

 

[Paul.R]

I don't give a ... about this tests.

I test my self some products and I like:
1. Kaspersky
2. G Data
3. Emsisoft
4. ESET
5. Bitdefender

 

[vrb93]

Anybody believe any of this stuff?

 

[Deleted member 21043]

These tests are fake or at the least, inaccurate. What a load of rubbish, I mean, seriously...

 

[Kate_L]

Vipre is a good engine, Badiu is also way better, I guess we can compare this with the tests from our forum. Also, I don't understand how products that have BitDefender engine are so low ... you take two different engines and even if the updates are 1 day delay you still have equal or better then one of the products.

Baidu = Avira + Kaspersk + Baidu engine and it is so bad ?

Eset is in top 3, we all know that from our tests. Panda is 4-5th place.... and so on.

This is how I think so please don't start a little war

 

[FleischmannTV]

I respect AV-Comparatives more than youtube reviews.

Edit: of course I take their results with a grain of salt as well. At least they don't bash MSE like AV-Test.

 

[Striker]

I respect AV-Comparatives more than youtube reviews.

same. heard somewhere(wilderssecurity i thing dont know anymore) that they get the same money from every vendor. so the fact "money" is useless.

 

[Arakasi]

Look at Trend Micro and McAfee on false positives. Haha

 

[Striker]

Look at Trend Micro and McAfee on false positives. Haha

they are the winners in detection false positive, gratulation! advanced+++ for destroying legitim windows programms and maybe destroying some os. thats why i would rather chose a av with almost 0 fp with middle protection than an av with superb protection and much fp that justs harms more than a malware itself.