- Content source
- https://youtu.be/L0FFDLd7jjk?si=KwwK9ZOQg40XkudB
Open MalwareTips from your Home Screen or desktop. Follow discussions, find answers and pick up where you left off.
If you cannot find an install option, update your browser or use its bookmark option to keep MalwareTips close.
After installation, open the app and sign in. Enable push notifications in Preferences if you want alerts. On iPhone and iPad, push requires a Home Screen web app and iOS or iPadOS 16.4 or later.
Sign in to manage notificationsInstallation is optional. Your notification settings stay under your control.
but if another AV carries out the same job (or even a better one) with a fraction of the resources used by Emsisoft, still "nothing wrong"?There is absolutely nothing wrong with Emsisoft's system resource usage
The amount of RAM used by any AV is irrelevant because the AVs have methods to hide the actual RAM usage - and most of them do hide the actual RAM usage. Emsisoft does not do that.but if another AV carries out the same job (or even a better one) with a fraction of the resources used by Emsisoft, still "nothing wrong"?
You mean Kaspersky, for example, is hiding its real RAM usage?The amount of RAM used by any AV is irrelevant because the AVs have methods to hide the actual RAM usage - and most of them do hide the actual RAM usage. Emsisoft does not do that.
Yes.You mean Kaspersky, for example, is hiding its real RAM usage?
In such a situation, would not task manager shows higher total RAM usage, even if not showing high RAM usage by K processes?
But I can see my RAM usage without opening task manager using a lovely, small program called "Core temp"; it shows RAM usage of 40% while using K or MD, while it can reach 60% while using B and Emsisoft, after elimination of other confounders.Ever notice with some applications that when the CPU fan is running and you open Task Manager, the CPU fan stops?
While that might be the case, still the amount of RAM usage is irrelevant. RAM is intended to be fully utilized. If a system has 16 GB RAM and the user chooses programs and settings to keep RAM at 2 GB or less, all they are doing is wasting the RAM that they paid for.But I can see my RAM usage without opening task manager using a lovely, small program called "Core temp"; it shows RAM usage of 40% while using K or MD, while it can reach 60% while using B and Emsisoft, after elimination of other confounders.
That's the case with many AVs as the solution starts going through behavioural reports (rather messy databases), attempting to classify and connect the dots what's related, what's the result of the attack or incident which is the proper way to call it, and to generate a removal script, which in the end is executed.Emsisoft prioritizes CPU usage so it could cause spikes if an infection is detected. Those old CPUs will putz along for a few minutes.
What about a higher "TOTAL" RAM?The key takeaway is that the amount of RAM shown for a single process in Task Manager is not the full story
It's still the same. It is irrelevant unless the system is RAM limited - meaning it has an inadequate amount of RAM.What about a higher "TOTAL" RAM?
And what about the RAM Defender uses, and not just RAM but CPU usage as well?What about a higher "TOTAL" RAM?
Think of your computer's RAM like your desk. When your desk is clear, you're not getting much work done. As you start a project, you pull out folders, notes, and books. A higher "total" usage just means your computer's desk is full of useful things it might need again, so it's ready to go.What about a higher "TOTAL" RAM?
MD is very efficient for me; uses between 50-100 MB RAM, and almost 0% CPU most of the time, almost as good as K, followed by Avast.And what about the RAM Defender uses, and not just RAM but CPU usage as well?![]()
This is probably the result of you RAM being limited because on my device it uses around 250. I can't show you now as I have something else installed.MD is very efficient for me; uses between 50-100 MB RAM, and almost 0% CPU most of the time, almost as good as K, followed by Avast.View attachment 290437
It is a good design of AV to efficiently use limited RAM, not a drawback; I would trust well-engineered AV for my protection more than a one which cannot utilize RAM in an economic way.This is probably the result of you RAM being limited because on my device it uses around 250. I can't show you now as I have something else installed.
I see your point but these are structural and operational properties, that have very little to do with how "good" the code is, how efficient the performance is, how well malware is detected. Using less RAM can actually lead to increase in the number of operations the CPU must perform. Furthermore, this in task manager is not the real ram. For years Norton was reporting 10-12 MB in task manager but other tools were showing that the RAM usage was 100-150 MB.It is a good design of AV to efficiently use limited RAM, not a drawback; I would trust well-engineered AV for my protection more than a one which cannot utilize RAM in an economic way.
A system that utilizes the available RAM to function as effectively as possible is a system that uses RAM economically.It is a good design of AV to efficiently use limited RAM, not a drawback; I would trust well-engineered AV for my protection more than a one which cannot utilize RAM in an economic way.
Members who viewed this thread in the last 5 minutes