[AV-tests] Home users, Windows 10, Oct 2016

Evjl's Rain

Level 47
Thread author
Verified
Honorary Member
Top Poster
Content Creator
Malware Hunter
Apr 18, 2016
3,676
28,872
4,599
A96KQp2.png

AV-TEST – The Independent IT-Security Institute


It seems unreliable to me
 
I am running KIS 2017 & performance mentioned matches with my system here i.e KIS 2017 is light with everything here as mentioned in the test details.

I have AIS license & thinking of installing it on one of my systems here, is Avast performance really that heavy as mentioned in the test details?
 
Have a look at ESET - Loading of popular websites is slowed by 53% on a standard PC whereas on a high end PC ESET slows things by 89% against an industry average of 18% ??? - Certainly not my experience after recently installing ESET again after trying out Trend & Panda among others, pretty sure I would notice a slowdown of such magnitude - Think I'll underclock my CPU to gain advantage in loading websites :-)
 
Not really fair on Panda & Avast for example using the free version against some premium suites from other companies.
On default settings, it doesn't make any difference, both free and paid versions have probably exactly the same detection level.
 
Another perfect score for BitDefender (like Av Comparatives)!

Just so happens I'll be doing a BitDefender Internet Security 2017 test this weekend. Guess we won't see any infections getting through...
 
I'm quite surprise for Quick heal.

However their performance can be very far compare to major giant competitors; protection capabilities are not in full force even contain DNA (heuristics) and BB.

The rest still as usual, so be ready for another proud award/ achievements in their product advertisements.
 
Avira performance?!!!
ESET performance ?!!!
cannot be sure about the result cause I m using win 7 ,but lot s of people complain about Avira nowadays,and lot of people are enjoying ESET,esp for its lightness
 
  • Like
Reactions: aragornnnn