Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Best Antivirus vs Windows Defender: What's the difference? (PC Security Channel)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Khushal" data-source="post: 1114051" data-attributes="member: 110394"><p>I did not like this video at all and found it misleading bcoz:</p><p>1. At 1:23 he says this is not a known malware but clearly it has a proper signature for Kaspersky. Even Bitdefender probably had one but he did not open bitdefender and checked but both were blocked based on static analysis. Static Analysis is not the only way defender can block threats. Obviously it is possible that defender gets bypassed here (albeit he did not show), this one case does not prove that defender is inferior. I can give countless examples to him or anyone else of samples that defender detects statically but kas or bd do not and few of them can even bypass the two giants.</p><p>2. In the video, he compares the bells and whistles of paid products to free Windows defender which does not make sense. A good amount of features say like VPN do not work in some countries. Will i get a discount in the paid plan of Kaspersky and Bitdefender. Obviously not.</p><p></p><p>Sad that he had no other video to upload so he had to upload an advert.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Khushal, post: 1114051, member: 110394"] I did not like this video at all and found it misleading bcoz: 1. At 1:23 he says this is not a known malware but clearly it has a proper signature for Kaspersky. Even Bitdefender probably had one but he did not open bitdefender and checked but both were blocked based on static analysis. Static Analysis is not the only way defender can block threats. Obviously it is possible that defender gets bypassed here (albeit he did not show), this one case does not prove that defender is inferior. I can give countless examples to him or anyone else of samples that defender detects statically but kas or bd do not and few of them can even bypass the two giants. 2. In the video, he compares the bells and whistles of paid products to free Windows defender which does not make sense. A good amount of features say like VPN do not work in some countries. Will i get a discount in the paid plan of Kaspersky and Bitdefender. Obviously not. Sad that he had no other video to upload so he had to upload an advert. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top