Best Behaviour Blocker?

Best Behaviour Blocker?

  • Emsisoft

    Votes: 52 41.6%
  • Kaspersky

    Votes: 47 37.6%
  • Avast

    Votes: 7 5.6%
  • Bitdefender

    Votes: 11 8.8%
  • ESET

    Votes: 1 0.8%
  • Other (Specify)

    Votes: 7 5.6%

  • Total voters
    125
The Antiransomware module is a bit odd. Most typical users will look at the alerts and logging and scratch their head. G DATA is a techie security soft.
Some of the Locky variants with (.lukitus) extension also leave me scratching my head, because AntiRansomware module detects most variants, stating that ".. following proccess were therefore interrupted by G DATA.." however it wasn't (or it was too late after clicking "Block", because encryption proccess weren't "frozen" when dialog box came up, and still kept going in background). Anyway, log files were collected and sent so I hope they come up with some improvements in next updates. :)
Capture2.PNG
Capture3.PNG
 
I can name a few G Data, Emsisoft, Kaspersky and AVG, but id recommend Emsisoft since it offers the most specific settings and is an internal part of their program
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fritz
And here in lies the problem in even asking this kind of questions. Multiple opens of different folks which leaves the equestion still unanswered. The answer is you have to evaluate and make your own decision.

This is the fundamental truth--one might be influenced by loyalty, subscription cost or customer service, variables that have nothing to do with a specific feature. It's not possible to be strictly objective when it comes to behavior blockers because of user interaction in real time, plus infinite machine/software combinations, etc.

Which leaves these AVs heavily dependent on marketing and word of mouth, both crucial for survival. And polls like this. :)
 
Some of the Locky variants with (.lukitus) extension also leave me scratching my head, because AntiRansomware module detects most variants, stating that ".. following proccess were therefore interrupted by G DATA.." however it wasn't (or it was too late after clicking "Block", because encryption proccess weren't "frozen" when dialog box came up, and still kept going in background). Anyway, log files were collected and sent so I hope they come up with some improvements in next updates. :)
View attachment 165499
View attachment 165500
In the same log, GDATA stated that processes were stopped and malware was deleted. Suspicious activity that triggered the detection was the rename of picture filles. Aka the behaviour blocker triggered the anti ransomware module when it was too late. It probably stopped the encryption at some time, too late. Another proof of this is that GData mentions the block of wscript.exe but the payload was already downloaded since it blocked it from the AppData folder.
 
In the same log, GDATA stated that processes were stopped and malware was deleted. Suspicious activity that triggered the detection was the rename of picture filles. Aka the behaviour blocker triggered the anti ransomware module when it was too late. It probably stopped the encryption at some time, too late. Another proof of this is that GData mentions the block of wscript.exe but the payload was already downloaded since it blocked it from the AppData folder.
I saw that happening with malware i been testing from the hub.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fritz
so Gdata should more improve their bb? no recommendation?