For some reason, EMET doesn't get talked about so much here on MT. I think the folks here prefer HitmanPro.Alert, despite the price, or they go for AppGuard, which basically makes everything else pretty much obsolete.
Is emet that underrated ?
For some reason, EMET doesn't get talked about so much here on MT. I think the folks here prefer HitmanPro.Alert, despite the price, or they go for AppGuard, which basically makes everything else pretty much obsolete.
I bet some of the more senior members of MT can answer this question. I never actually used it myself.Is emet that underrated ?
For some reason, EMET doesn't get talked about so much here on MT. I think the folks here prefer HitmanPro.Alert, despite the price, or they go for AppGuard, which basically makes everything else pretty much obsolete.
I wouldn't say it's underrated, however I would certainly prefer to use a product like HitmanPro.Alert, strictly because it will be more useful most likely (e.g. I prefer HMP.A anti-ransomware, supports prevention of exploits such as BadUSB which I doubt EMET can do, etc).Is emet that underrated ?
From Windows 8/8.1 and on-wards, some system processes are now protected, improving the default security for them (reducing exploits towards them). However, even for processes like SvcHost.exe (the genuine version/s) or winlogon.exe to be used, the malware will require code execution at administrator level.shmu26. I haven't been able to find much IT advice or tips on how to use EMET. Maybe that's partly why it's not being used much? I am going to end up shelling for something eventually I guess. I would like to see what EMET can do if all installed programs are set to be monitored. Right now, I am just monitoring browser and some Windows processes like svchost that I thought might be exploitable. I wonder if I should use it with any net related Windows applications or maybe winlogon. Winlogon worries me that there might be a conflict with the normal login process.
End of the conversation, EMET is only a group of protections of one type, memory mitigation. HitmanPro.Alert or Appguard seem to be much more capable for sure. Many others I guess too would be considered much more useful for behavior monitoring. Anyway, I feel inspired to look around a little bit more for commentary on EMET, so thanks alot for the comment.
HTML5 will be a more secure option; I recommend against using Flash if possible.I was looking up info on plugin-container, because I couldn't understand why it and Flash weren't running with a YouTube video running. I realized I had video set to HTML5 lol on YouTube Video Player plug in I use to watch YouTube videos in Flash. Someone had uploaded an HTML5 video only in that format that I wanted to watch a few days ago, and I forgot to reset the plugin. I was checking in EMET to see if I had protected Flash and plugin-container which I had already done. I will check to see if this is in the Firefox forum.
I don't understand what you mean about watching the screen tear when using HTML5, I don't see a difference on websites like YouTube (e.g. using the HTML5 video player as opposed to the Flash one). There's no problem with liking Flash games, you could enable click-to-play for Adobe Flash on your browser (if it supports it - most mainstream browsers such as IE, Chrome and Firefox will support it) and then click to play your Flash games, alongside using HTML5 for websites like YouTube (e.g. the video player), combined with EMET to safeguard you with additional exploit mitigation.True, but I have used Flash for years, and I am accostomed to the risk. Honestly, HTML5 gives me a headache lol. I feel like I am watching the screen tear before my eyes, while I don't experience that with Flash video. I have no idea why this happens. This was one of the main reasons I looked into EMET, so that I could better secure Firefox and Flash player. Also, I have to mention that I enjoy some of the Flash games on certain sites that I have a long experience with and trust.