- Apr 1, 2019
- 2,868
New features tend to introduce bugs. They know all about those.
Bitdefender 2020 Released
- Thread starter chabbo
- Start date
- May 26, 2014
- 1,339
If you guys will be asking for new features in the official forum, request TLS 1.3 support for me
- Feb 8, 2016
- 537
And a lot of hours later, Bitdefender still not detecting the sample.
- Feb 17, 2018
- 870
Its been detected by Advanced Threat Defense.And a lot of hours later, Bitdefender still not detecting the sample.
- Feb 8, 2016
- 537
- Jul 15, 2016
- 321
Bitdefend can't catch Factura990834Elec11814-3007.exe
I just tried it
I just tried it
- May 10, 2019
- 2,289
I have submitted a sample to Bitdefender and it got added to their signatures after 72 hours.
- Jul 15, 2016
- 321
Ok Catched after 23 minutes not so good. :/
- May 26, 2014
- 1,339
I dont have the sample so all I can do is speculate but this "long" time to detect isnt a problem with BD's behavior blocker, maybe the sample was dormant (delayed execution) and only reached malicious threshold after 23 minutes (tried to download/run something, called home and so on).
Bit Defender 2020 + Gryphon Router (ESET) = Dream Combo? I'd think so!
As others have said, it's terrible. Dr.Web has by far the best PUP detection. It detects well over 4,000 PUPs, as you can see in the screenshot.
- Dec 30, 2012
- 4,809
Slightly off topic but does Dr Web offer an interactive firewall?
I'm not sure, as I don't use it myself. I just regularly notice the excellent PUP detection, when scanning installers at VirusTotal.
- May 3, 2015
- 1,741
Something not being detect by a particular product in Virus Total does not mean that product does not detect it on the consumer/business version. Virus Total uses the Linux version of the scanner, does not have all the modules of the desktop version and does not necessarily have the latest signatures loaded.
We have seem examples of this many times in this forum. Virus Total is good to check if a file is suspicious but not to check if a particular engine would detect it in a real infection situation.
We have seem examples of this many times in this forum. Virus Total is good to check if a file is suspicious but not to check if a particular engine would detect it in a real infection situation.
My experience is based on actually doing scans with Bitdefender, not just scans at VirusTotal.
- Dec 30, 2012
- 4,809
True...I have seen that many times !
- Feb 8, 2016
- 537
- Feb 8, 2016
- 537
Probably a new payload is dropped by the malware, is available here: VirusTotal
- Mar 16, 2019
- 3,862
In my experience, the best way to submit malwares to Bitdefender is to send to Emsisoft via email. I submitted a particular malware to BD multiple times in the past but they never added that to their signatures. It was an old sample. Then I submitted to Emsisoft via email and they replied they'll forward that to Bitdefender team. Then within 18 hours Bitdefender added the signature of that malware to their database.
As my sample was forwarded to them via Emsisoft, they gave that sample a higher priority hence created the signature as fast as they could.
As my sample was forwarded to them via Emsisoft, they gave that sample a higher priority hence created the signature as fast as they could.
- Feb 17, 2018
- 870
