- Apr 1, 2019
- 2,868
Probably user complaints because it blocked some shady program they were trying to run.
Bitdefender 2021 released
- Thread starter fabiobr
- Start date
- Mar 30, 2018
- 139
It is fixed yes, the problem is with you, not in Bitdefender, I did not have to disable any QUIC protocol, working here in a standard way.
- Apr 6, 2016
- 440
in my case Firewall was On by defauly, i just checked it
i downloaded the new version from my central tho. not sure if that's the case ..
i downloaded the new version from my central tho. not sure if that's the case ..
I just made tests with the new version and practically nothing has changed, detection of pups, which is the great weakness of the product, they did nothing about it, the mechanism is still gigantic and heavy, I think it only changed the interface, while not changing anything relevant will remain inferior to kaspersky
I have no hope of improving bitdefender, everything looks the same every time, I think just by changing the mechanism and starting from scratch. which I find very difficult. now it is waiting for Avira and Eset to update their products and hope for a behavior detector because otherwise they are excellent, especially Avira. Kaspersky without comments is already the best on the market.
I have no hope of improving bitdefender, everything looks the same every time, I think just by changing the mechanism and starting from scratch. which I find very difficult. now it is waiting for Avira and Eset to update their products and hope for a behavior detector because otherwise they are excellent, especially Avira. Kaspersky without comments is already the best on the market.
[CITAÇÃO = "Mariihh, post: 895921, membro: 71283"]
Foi corrigido sim, o problema está com você, não no Bitdefender, não precisei desativar nenhum protocolo QUIC, trabalhando aqui de maneira padrão.
[/CITAR]
Funny the problem is with me, but I formatted the machine twice and installed Bitdefender directly from the Bitdefender central and the problem continues, but anyway I will not stay here discussing it, you are right then
Foi corrigido sim, o problema está com você, não no Bitdefender, não precisei desativar nenhum protocolo QUIC, trabalhando aqui de maneira padrão.
[/CITAR]
Funny the problem is with me, but I formatted the machine twice and installed Bitdefender directly from the Bitdefender central and the problem continues, but anyway I will not stay here discussing it, you are right then
- Mar 28, 2019
- 569
I think you are overreacting.
Bitdefender improved a lot inside from years ago, and, at least on my systems, I feel it lighter than Kaspersky, especially browsing.
Last edited:
- May 16, 2013
- 844
Good news , they are working on TLS 1.3 but I don't have an estimated date.
- Aug 2, 2015
- 615
- May 16, 2013
- 844
Hope not 
I hope with next product updates or on next version, when I have some news about it I will post it here.
I hope with next product updates or on next version, when I have some news about it I will post it here.it is not an exaggeration, it is the reality, bitdefender just optimized the mechanism that remains very heavy and gigantic, there were no improvements where it really needed to evolve
- Apr 1, 2019
- 2,868
Define heavy please.
I think he means if you install Bitdefender 2021, your PC will fall through the floor.
- Apr 1, 2019
- 2,868
This is not a universal problem for everyone (anyone running 8+ GB). Also, anything in memory works faster. They have reduced memory usage quite a bit outside of scans. It may not be for you, but it is not universally trash.
- Mar 29, 2018
- 7,711
It's now on par with Windows Defender, FWIW.
- May 26, 2014
- 1,339
How dare Bitdefender has the courage to use 1,5 % of my system total RAM? It is totally unacceptable, everyone knows that unutilized RAM is good RAM, right guys?
On a serious note:
blog.emsisoft.com
On a serious note:
Why antivirus uses so much RAM - And why that is actually a good thing!
Learn why freeing RAM doesn't necessarily speed up your computer. In reality it's often quite the opposite.
blog.emsisoft.com
Last edited:
- May 3, 2015
- 1,763
We should have a sticky thread explaining why an antivirus using RAM does not make it heavy or badly coded... Right now Chromium Edge is using more RAM than Kaspersky in my system, for instance...
Today do you think Bitdefender 2021 is ahead of ESET in terms of protection even though it consumes more computer resources?
Sorry for my ignorance
Sorry for my ignorance
- May 3, 2015
- 1,763
I would say most major vendors have equivalent protection so use the one that does not slow down your machine, that has an interface you find simple and has the better price.
There is malware that will go through any product. The fact that A blocks malware X and B doesn't does not make A better than B. If you look for it, you'll find a malware that is detected by B and not A.
There is malware that will go through any product. The fact that A blocks malware X and B doesn't does not make A better than B. If you look for it, you'll find a malware that is detected by B and not A.
