Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Shadowra" data-source="post: 1022644" data-attributes="member: 92939">Hello and welcome to this comparison!Today I&#039;m going to compare F-Secure SAFE and Eset which are the most popular antivirus programs of the moment in the paid ones.Will they compete? Are they equal? Let&#039;s see![MEDIA=odysee]id=c47f16971bdb1bdf7a5972e51e006d60c18cc2de;name=F-Secure-SAFE-vs-ESET-Internet-Security;path=%40Shadowra%3Af%2FF-Secure-SAFE-vs-ESET-Internet-Security%3Ac[/MEDIA]Interface:The 2 interfaces are not similar at all! Although I like F-Secure&#039;s interface because it focuses a lot on novices (ready-to-use antivirus like Trend Micro), I really like Eset&#039;s one which is a mix. It&#039;s good by default, but it can still be improved with fine tuning. And you can go very far!Ram Usage:The 2 antivirus are very light. The VM is equipped with 8GB of RAM on my 32GB host and occupies 6 logical cores on my 12 logical cores of my Ryzen 5.Protection:On the Web, nothing to say about the 2 antivirus. The blocks are perfect, ditto on the fake crack.When I test the malware pack, we feel a different approach on the 2 antivirus.F-Secure focuses on Avira and its engine and catches attacks with DeepGuard, which keeps the PC healthy.Eset is much more aggressive on threats: If it is a threat, it is quarantined directly!On Eset, I had a lot of samples that didn&#039;t work even though they worked with F-Secure. I don&#039;t know if Eset disinfected them but that&#039;s a very good point.Conclusion:The 2 antiviruses make a system healthy. Even if NPE reports an installer in the Eset test, the latter was not active, so I had stopped the installation.It is a draw between F-Secure and Eset.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Shadowra, post: 1022644, member: 92939"] Hello and welcome to this comparison! Today I'm going to compare F-Secure SAFE and Eset which are the most popular antivirus programs of the moment in the paid ones. Will they compete? Are they equal? Let's see! [MEDIA=odysee]id=c47f16971bdb1bdf7a5972e51e006d60c18cc2de;name=F-Secure-SAFE-vs-ESET-Internet-Security;path=%40Shadowra%3Af%2FF-Secure-SAFE-vs-ESET-Internet-Security%3Ac[/MEDIA] [U][B]Interface:[/B][/U] The 2 interfaces are not similar at all! Although I like F-Secure's interface because it focuses a lot on novices (ready-to-use antivirus like Trend Micro), I really like Eset's one which is a mix. It's good by default, but it can still be improved with fine tuning. And you can go very far! [U][B]Ram Usage:[/B][/U] The 2 antivirus are very light. The VM is equipped with 8GB of RAM on my 32GB host and occupies 6 logical cores on my 12 logical cores of my Ryzen 5. [U][B]Protection:[/B][/U] On the Web, nothing to say about the 2 antivirus. The blocks are perfect, ditto on the fake crack. When I test the malware pack, we feel a different approach on the 2 antivirus. F-Secure focuses on Avira and its engine and catches attacks with DeepGuard, which keeps the PC healthy. Eset is much more aggressive on threats: If it is a threat, it is quarantined directly! On Eset, I had a lot of samples that didn't work even though they worked with F-Secure. I don't know if Eset disinfected them but that's a very good point. [U][B]Conclusion:[/B][/U] The 2 antiviruses make a system healthy. Even if NPE reports an installer in the Eset test, the latter was not active, so I had stopped the installation. It is a draw between F-Secure and Eset. [/QUOTE]

Verification