Compare your PC performance score with MT members [New edition]

[Dex4Sure]

Decided to throw my results here too. All stock speeds, RAM slightly even underclocked (but timings slightly tightened) since the damn things won't run 100% stable at their rated XMP settings...

CPU set at Intel stock spec setting instead of allowing motherboard manufacturer's auto overclock settings, just makes the fans ramp up too much and haven't bothered to play with vcore voltage settings too much yet... Quite frankly don't really care to overclock the CPU to gain 200-300MHz extra clockspeed in exchange for massive increase in heat output and power consumption.

Good ol' 1080 Ti still chugging along nicely as well. Don't play much newer games, and steadily playing less and less in general so haven't seen much reason to upgrade it so far.

 

[blackice]

New score after processor swap:



Not sure what is up with the disk score being lower. Maybe something was updating. I closed all extra background programs.

I'm guessing the read and write speeds are backwards on Novabench, or something weird is interfering. Maybe AV.

 

[Dex4Sure]

I think novabench is rather poor and inaccurate benchmark. My disk reading speed is noticeably higher than write and for instance crystaldiskmark shows that.

 

[blackice]

I think novabench is rather poor and inaccurate benchmark. My disk reading speed is noticeably higher than write and for instance crystaldiskmark shows that.

I agree. But it's free and fun. My Crystal Disk scores match the reviews for my drive almost perfectly.

 

[Alexhousek]

New Lenovo desktop. (I will be adding another 8 GB of ram when I can afford it.)

Another 8 GB RAM only took the score to 3364. Not much of a difference.

 

[ForgottenSeer 85179]

Another 8 GB RAM only took the score to 3364. Not much of a difference.

Mostly depends on RAM speed

 

[ForgottenSeer 92963]

Old man, old PC from 2011

Last year I changed my 4 core i7 920 for a second hand 6 core Xeon X5675 which I could buy for only 50 euro.

 

[show-Zi]

I updated from core i-5 / 760 which I have been using for more than 10 years to core i-3 / 12100. I am satisfied with the dramatic improvement in capacity with an investment of about 250 €.

 

[Nevi]

 

[marcopaone]

SSD SPEED:

 

[simbatippe1234]

 

[brambedkar59]

I am blind lol. I was gonna quote Nevi's post saying I got same CPU but it's mobile version. Then it clicked I have 11th Gen CPU he got 12th gen lmao.

 

[Shadowra]

 

[Cleo]

 

[show-Zi]

@brambedkar59
Compared to the 12th + GTX (@Nevi ), I am amazed at the excellence of the Intel GPU. When the price of the graphic card is soaring, it may be better than F in terms of cost performance.

 

[brambedkar59]

@brambedkar59
Compared to the 12th + GTX (@Nevi ), I am amazed at the excellence of the Intel GPU. When the price of the graphic card is soaring, it may be better than F in terms of cost performance.

Lol, Novabench is stupid, it wasn't ran on Intel UHD. It actually ran on RTX 3050 Ti for GPU test.

 

[show-Zi]

Lol, Novabench is stupid, it wasn't ran on Intel UHD. It actually ran on RTX 3050 Ti for GPU test.

I was starting to regret buying F, so I was relieved to hear that

 

[Cleo]

These are the results from my nieces computers. A few anomalies - An Optane M.2 NVME SSD performed terribly and another's OS was mistakenly installed on the slowish 2.5" SSD instead of its M.2 NVME stick.

 

[The_King]

The NVMe write speeds seems low in the Novabench test.

 

[plat]

My six year old graphics card still seems to be holding up OK. Crystal Disk Mark shows much higher score for my drive, esp. sequential writes, like others have also reported.

Spoiler