@Trident Hello, I just noticed some duplicated Deep Firewall Control's rules, both in blocked, like the above screenshot, than in allowed. What could be the reason of that ?



If they are pointing to the same path, they should be deduplicated when you relaunch the software.@Trident Hello, I just noticed some duplicated Deep Firewall Control's rules, both in blocked, like the above screenshot, than in allowed. What could be the reason of that ?
View attachment 296058
It will start blocking even more soon, as more features will be integrated.This is an excellent tool. I really appreciate how informative it is, especially when analyzing unfamiliar websites. The interface is visually appealing, and the graphics are well-designed. It provides detailed explanations about any suspicious characteristics it detects on a website, which makes it easy to understand potential risks. It also works very well alongside Windows Defender, making it a strong complementary security solution. When I tested it against spam emails, it successfully blocked nearly every malicious page I attempted to access. Overall, this tool shows great potential to become one of the leading web protection services available.
Very much looking forward to future improvements.Although some sites are not fully blocked, the following notification is displayed. This can be controlled in settings to which @nickstar1 doesn't have access yet.
It took insane number of optimisations to render these notifications in the sub-200 millisecond speed level.
View attachment 296059
Looks and runs great hereYou can download an early trial of Helios Web Marshall from here:
deploy.hea-p.com/executable/HeliosSetup.exe
Web Marshall has its own background service, you can choose to install only Web Marshall.
This is not the finalised product, but it is very close.
Download Protection logics need to be tweaked.
The extension will not work without the installed instance of Web Marshall.
There is a detailed log in ProgramData how exactly the extension operates. I left it on purpose, for transparency.Looks and runs great here
I am looking forward to seeing the finished product.
According to this post, there may be a slight drawback regarding WFCNo, Deep Firewall Control isn't a firewall. After a Deep Firewall Control's scan it creates its own allow / block rules based on exe's reputation. If you are looking for a firewall I can suggest what currently I'm using: the 3rd party firewall Windows 11 Firewall Control (formerly Sphinx Software Windows 10 Firewall Control) https://malwaretips.com/threads/windows-10-firewall-control-sphinx-software-opinions.108168/post-1130015 and Binisoft / Malwarebytes Windows Firewall Control which is a enhanced GUI for managing the Windows Firewall New Update - Windows Firewall Control - Updates Thread
Both softwares are free of charge. If you have some questions about them you can post them on the dedicated thread. I'll reply there.
Deep Firewall Scan rules
View attachment 296051
It has one negative point, it allow svchost.exe for all processes in the pre-configured rule "Windows update".WFC has a better layout and options (full screen mode) and rules that can be easily verified in VirusTotal
It could be a bit later because Talon initially wasn’t planned.fwiw -- I reconsidered putting the app & ext on my host win10 (I have to make an image) but will try it on win10_vm with MSD soon. I recall some weeks ago you mentioned it would be ready by 03 March, (iirc) is that still the timeline?
There is no other way this could be executed.According to this post, there may be a slight drawback regarding WFC
AV-Comparatives Post in thread 'Consumer Summary Report 2025'
It has one negative point, it allow svchost.exe for all processes in the pre-configured rule "Windows update".WFC has a better layout and options (full screen mode) and rules that can be easily verified in VirusTotal
No problem, it wasn't so much about your software, but about WFC in general. I remember at one time BD Firewall Alert Mode was alerting after every software update driving some members nuts with continual notifications. I personally ditched WFC in favor of letting Avast firewall handle things.There is no other way this could be executed.
WFP (Windows Filtering Platform) allows creation of rule either by file path or by PID.
Technically it could be done, but the software will have to re-examine all the running processes, get the PID of the one that is associated with Windows Update and block the rest.
It will have to be performed on every start.
Majority of the firewalls create rules by file path.
Yeah, it was about this software.No problem, it wasn't so much about your software, but about WFC in general. I remember at one time BD Firewall Alert Mode was alerting after every software update driving some members nuts with continual notifications. I personally ditched WFC in favor of letting Avast firewall handle things.
I got a little tired of the WFC "Allow this?" rule fatigue (even though it quiets down after awhile)So IMO, yours is wonderful, more of what I'd want to use
![]()
I just edited, it is deploy, not download.Hello, when I click on the links the download doesn't start but a webpage is opened. I'm using Firefox
View attachment 296629
View attachment 296630





