Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="danb" data-source="post: 961196" data-attributes="member: 62850">Hey Kees!It is truly great to see you again!I do remember you suggesting some kind of integration with MD, but at the time I was focused on proving to Avast that dynamic security postures was one of the keys to solving cybersecurity.&nbsp; And at the time I had no idea how it would work, or even if I was capable of such a thing back then.Either way, I appreciate your help and input!&nbsp; The only thing I regret is that when we talked to Avast is that we did not focus on dynamic security postures, and instead focused on VoodooAi.&nbsp; VoodooAi is okay, but it is easily reproducible, and probably not too difficult to make it better.&nbsp; The combo of WLC and VoodooAi is an entire different story.&nbsp; I think it would be difficult to find an engine that limits the bypasses and false positives like WLC does.&nbsp; Sure, it has false positives... but there is nothing wrong with confirming you want to run something.Anyway, it really is great to talk to you again... we should skype sometime <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="danb, post: 961196, member: 62850"] Hey Kees! It is truly great to see you again! I do remember you suggesting some kind of integration with MD, but at the time I was focused on proving to Avast that dynamic security postures was one of the keys to solving cybersecurity. And at the time I had no idea how it would work, or even if I was capable of such a thing back then. Either way, I appreciate your help and input! The only thing I regret is that when we talked to Avast is that we did not focus on dynamic security postures, and instead focused on VoodooAi. VoodooAi is okay, but it is easily reproducible, and probably not too difficult to make it better. The combo of WLC and VoodooAi is an entire different story. I think it would be difficult to find an engine that limits the bypasses and false positives like WLC does. Sure, it has false positives... but there is nothing wrong with confirming you want to run something. Anyway, it really is great to talk to you again... we should skype sometime ;). [/QUOTE]

Verification