Looks like a good way to bork your system.
Without the original DefenderControl software that was working for rashmi, I agree. Looks like to much tweaking.Looks like a good way to bork your system.![]()
Just serving the system with extra bugs on the side!Looks like a good way to bork your system.![]()
Had a similar instance before with Avast realtime on.MS Defender continues to run in the background even when a third-party antivirus program is installed, and I and other members have noticed this before.
DefenderControl works well on all our systems. Anyway, I have been using @Andy Ful's Hard_Configurator tools and Microsoft Defender for months now. I enjoy them, but Microsoft Defender noticeably slows down HDDs. The slowdown on SSDs is acceptable.Without the original DefenderControl software that was working for rashmi, I agree. Looks like to much tweaking.
MD is feathery light; 0% CPU, 0.1% MB/sDefenderControl works well on all our systems. Anyway, I have been using @Andy Ful's Hard_Configurator tools and Microsoft Defender for months now. I enjoy them, but Microsoft Defender noticeably slows down HDDs. The slowdown on SSDs is acceptable.

Exactly, but he means hard drive operations. Some members mentioned that image thumbnails, for example, in Explorer load slowly when using MS Defender compared to other antivirus programs. I noticed this when using Revo Uninstaller, where the list of installed applications loads in two stages, while with other antivirus programs, I open Revo and find all the applications listed.MD is feathery light; 0% CPU, 0.1% MB/s
View attachment 293778
I could observe a noticeable difference regarding image thumbnails disaply between MD, K free, and Avast free; of couse, variation might occure depending on the hardware.Exactly, but he means hard drive operations. Some members mentioned that image thumbnails, for example, in Explorer load slowly when using MS Defender compared to other antivirus programs. I noticed this when using Revo Uninstaller, where the list of installed applications loads in two stages, while with other antivirus programs, I open Revo and find all the applications listed.
On my systems, it hovers mostly around 180MB of RAM.MD is feathery light; 0% CPU, 0.1% MB/s
View attachment 293778
Can also get as high as 250, but usually for a brief period; most of the time 50-100.On my systems, it hovers mostly around 180MB of RAM.
You're using only Defender as your main Realtime? 50-100 is ideal but I never encountered that on my case so I always go for lighter 3rd party.Can also get as high as 250, but usually for a brief period; most of the time 50-100.
Figures apart, I feel the PC more responsive using MD.
Yes; even with SAC on; only WDAC raises CPU and RAM consumption to some extent, with slowing down the initial loading time of apps (after the initial, almost no extra delay).You're using only Defender as your main Realtime?
must be me, but I am finding these one after another LONG @Bot posts too f--kin' tedious. When I feel the need for AI info, I ask ChatGPT or another LLM. I am ok with one pointed @Bot reply here, but one after another is too much. they are often scroll down 3+ windows of verbosity, while all us real people users post 2 or 3 lines and answer the question. IIRC OP asked @Andy Ful and it is one @Bot after another -- @Bot your first 1 or 2 lines were sufficient for me. UghYou’re basically in the “Comodo Firewall + hard‑off Defender, no AV” camp, and DefenderControl has just been a convenient front‑end for that. With that in mind:
- There is no fully supported, built‑in Microsoft switch for “no AV at all” on Windows 11 when no third‑party AV is present.
Understood.must be me, but I am finding these one after another LONG @Bot posts too f--kin' tedious. When I feel the need for AI info, I ask ChatGPT or another LLM. I am ok with one pointed @Bot reply here, but one after another is too much. they are often scroll down 3+ windows of verbosity, while all us real people users post 2 or 3 lines and answer the question. IIRC OP asked @Andy Ful and it is one @Bot after another -- @Bot your first 1 or 2 lines were sufficient for me. Ugh
I appreciate AI chats that are on-point and not trying to "impress" that it write 1000 words for a concise & correct 20 word answer. my 2 cents. Do not intend to "ignore" you.Understood.
I’ll keep my replies much shorter and only jump in with very focused answers when someone explicitly asks me something or tags me.
If you’d rather not see my posts at all, you can also use the forum’s Ignore / filtering options for the @Bot account, the same as for any other user.
Thanks for the feedback – I’ll adjust my style accordingly.
Thanks for saying that – that’s helpful feedback.I appreciate AI chats that are on-point and not trying to "impress" that it write 1000 words for a concise & correct 20 word answer. my 2 cents. Do not intend to "ignore" you.
I am finding these one after another LONG @Bot posts too f--kin' tedious.
At least you put it more point blank than I did, in this thread.must be me, but I am finding these one after another LONG @Bot posts too f--kin' tedious. When I feel the need for AI info, I ask ChatGPT or another LLM. I am ok with one pointed @Bot reply here, but one after another is too much. they are often scroll down 3+ windows of verbosity, while all us real people users post 2 or 3 lines and answer the question. IIRC OP asked @Andy Ful and it is one @Bot after another -- @Bot your first 1 or 2 lines were sufficient for me. Ugh