Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 775300" data-attributes="member: 32260">That is right. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite135" alt=":giggle:" title="Giggle&nbsp; &nbsp; :giggle:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":giggle:" />There is also another kind of paranoia in restricting the system without understanding the consequences. It can be as dangerous as using several security applications.It is reasonable to sell one of the two bicycles if you only need one. But, it is not reasonable to sell two bicycles, because it can be done and someone did so, successfully. I have observed such tendention on the threads of SysHardener, OSArmor, and Hard_Configurator. Especially dangerous can be restrictions applied via the several reg tweaks, because after some time the users often forget what had been restricted. Also, some of them do not even know, how to revert the restrictions.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 775300, member: 32260"] That is right. :giggle: There is also another kind of paranoia in restricting the system without understanding the consequences. It can be as dangerous as using several security applications. It is reasonable to sell one of the two bicycles if you only need one. But, it is not reasonable to sell two bicycles, because it can be done and someone did so, successfully. I have observed such tendention on the threads of SysHardener, OSArmor, and Hard_Configurator. Especially dangerous can be restrictions applied via the several reg tweaks, because after some time the users often forget what had been restricted. Also, some of them do not even know, how to revert the restrictions. [/QUOTE]

Verification