Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
Do you understand Malware Protection tests?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 932738" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>It is good that [USER=71496]@Adrian Ścibor[/USER] has entered this thread. It would be also interesting to invite someone from the staff of Trend Micro or AV-Comparatives. [USER=89360]@McMcbrad[/USER] and [USER=82776]@Lenny_Fox[/USER] can you do it, or help me to do it?</p><p></p><p>I would like to clarify that such tests as in the OP are probably the most interesting. It is improbable to get such results by chance. So, this proves that the AV-Comparatives and AVLab have somehow found the potential weak points in the AV protection. But, we do not know how these weak points may impact the overall protection in the wild (in the home environment). For example, in the AV-Test tests, there are no such anomalous results for Trend Micro both for fresh and older samples. In fact, during the two-year period (2019-2020), Trend Micro was compromised 5 times by the web-originated malware and 0 times by the older widespread and prevalent malware (only Norton got better results in the first category).<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite132" alt=":unsure:" title="Unsure :unsure:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":unsure:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 932738, member: 32260"] It is good that [USER=71496]@Adrian Ścibor[/USER] has entered this thread. It would be also interesting to invite someone from the staff of Trend Micro or AV-Comparatives. [USER=89360]@McMcbrad[/USER] and [USER=82776]@Lenny_Fox[/USER] can you do it, or help me to do it? I would like to clarify that such tests as in the OP are probably the most interesting. It is improbable to get such results by chance. So, this proves that the AV-Comparatives and AVLab have somehow found the potential weak points in the AV protection. But, we do not know how these weak points may impact the overall protection in the wild (in the home environment). For example, in the AV-Test tests, there are no such anomalous results for Trend Micro both for fresh and older samples. In fact, during the two-year period (2019-2020), Trend Micro was compromised 5 times by the web-originated malware and 0 times by the older widespread and prevalent malware (only Norton got better results in the first category).:unsure: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top