App Review ESET Internet Security 2017 BETA (default settings) Prevention and Detection Test

[safe1st]

Hope you enjoy the test.
Thanks for watching!

 

[TheMalwareMaster]

Good video, but remember that, If you reset ESET to default settings, PUP detection will be disabled

 

[safe1st]

Good video, but remember that, If you reset ESET to default settings, PUP detection will be disabled

That they way I tell to everyone I use default settings

 

[Der.Reisende]

Great vid, thanks for sharing @safe1st Looks like a good product

 

[_CyberGhosT_]

Awesome buddy, Thank You

 

[Daniel Hidalgo]

thanks for sharing amazing review

 

[starsfighter]

thank you
i think hips notifications are disabled by default!...
i don't know what about the other malwares ?

 

[DJ Panda]

Thanks for the video ! Glad you are back to doing videos!

 

[TheBlue262]

Thanks for the test!

 

[minegroasprilla]

My father wants to install ESET NOD32 and Comodo Firewall.
So, I need to know if that combination offers strong protection.

 

[minegroasprilla]

My father wants to install ESET NOD32 and Comodo Firewall.
So, I need to know if that combination offers strong protection.

Please, I need answers.

 

[TheMalwareMaster]

I would recommend to replace comodo firewall with VoodooShield. It's more user-friendly for an average user. It's a Free anti-executable

 

[JB007]

@safe1st : Thank you very much for this interesting video

 

[FrankS]

Thanks for that nice review

 

[safe1st]

Please, I need answers.

its strong but it make your father confuse, because comodo firewall. personally I dont want use comodo firewall
its my opinion..

 

[minegroasprilla]

I would recommend to replace comodo firewall with VoodooShield. It's more user-friendly for an average user. It's a Free anti-executable

ah, ok. VoodooShield with ESET NOD32.

 

[TheMalwareMaster]

ah, ok. VoodooShield with ESET NOD32.

To be honest, ESET is not even needed. You can Also use Windows defender or an other Free AV with vodooshield and get an excellent protection

 

[King Alpha]

Thanks for the share. @safe1st

 

[Nikos751]

windw

windows defender is ver poor and free antivius please.

Generally, it has lower detection rates than other known products and as you can see TheMalwareMaster does not suggest using it alone, but along with VoodooShield. Windows Defender is one of the most compatible with other security utilities product, and light on resources from many aspects. That's the main reason.

 

[Evjl's Rain]

Generally, it has lower detection rates than other known products and as you can see TheMalwareMaster does not suggest using it alone, but along with VoodooShield. Windows Defender is one of the most compatible with other security utilities product, and light on resources from many aspects. That's the main reason.

I totally agree that WD is the most compatible AV but I really doubt about its lightness
I always feel and confirm using task manager that WD is not lighter than other popular AVs. WD consumed so much CPU and disk while I didn't do anything, just sat and observed for a few minutes
I have tried KIS, avast and WD, avira recently. WD is the heaviest; avira is also the heaviest only when it causes memory leak. Avast with some of performance tweaks is the lightest