- Jul 3, 2017
- 626
Yes!
This is my point. The others detect it, and report accordingly, whereas in regards to Eset, the suggestion being made is that because Eset does NOT respond, therefore it is not malicious.
Therefore, the question is which is better: to have some type of alert, or nothing and make an informed decision to ignore?
I guess this all boils down to personal preference if you trust your software and its reputation.
Last edited: