Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Marcos" data-source="post: 904677" data-attributes="member: 9023">Unfortunately it&#039;s not clear what you mean. Please elaborate.Well, according to the others ESET has an excellent detection of pot. unwanted applications. It is not clear based on what you&#039;ve made such statement. Also it&#039;s not clear what you mean by maximum protection; setting the detection level to aggressive should not increase the number of PUA FPs.Cleaning is fully automatic. Basically only if there is a system file infected with a non-cleanable virus the user should be prompted for an action. This is because automatic deletion of such file could render the OS non-functional.The differences in tests are very minimal when it comes to missed malware. However, in terms of false positives and performance, ESET is typically in top 3 if not the first.It is not clear what you mean. ESET uses one of the strongest web protection modules compared with other AVs. Please elaborate.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Marcos, post: 904677, member: 9023"] Unfortunately it's not clear what you mean. Please elaborate. Well, according to the others ESET has an excellent detection of pot. unwanted applications. It is not clear based on what you've made such statement. Also it's not clear what you mean by maximum protection; setting the detection level to aggressive should not increase the number of PUA FPs. Cleaning is fully automatic. Basically only if there is a system file infected with a non-cleanable virus the user should be prompted for an action. This is because automatic deletion of such file could render the OS non-functional. The differences in tests are very minimal when it comes to missed malware. However, in terms of false positives and performance, ESET is typically in top 3 if not the first. It is not clear what you mean. ESET uses one of the strongest web protection modules compared with other AVs. Please elaborate. [/QUOTE]

Verification