People do not care. The outer world is different from MT. Chrome just works. It dominates the market share and change is not easy nor needed by people.
Firefox shares roadmap as it loses users at an alarming rate
- Thread starter Parkinsond
- Start date
I can completely understand your point of view and I can accept the outside world's use of these services for their quality, but we specifically in the region must reconsider our calculations and evaluate our choices and not support companies that support the Z entity, because in the end our support for them is used to exterminate us. It is true that they always claim that their problem is only with X and Y, but history has proven that they always lie. We do not want to say we were eaten the day the white bull was eaten, or is it too late for that!
Firefox has a different approach. It won't download any models on its own, but it does come with some smaller model in order to have basic AI functions working such as translation, or describing tabs. If you want to use advanced AI, it will offer you to download the larger model.
You can import everything from Chrome to Firefox with relative ease. Then use Firefox Sync to sync everything to Mozilla account.
I am an activist and some UK websites called me a "hardcore propagandist" because of my principles. I personally lost my old life because of Zs.I can completely understand your point of view and I can accept the outside world's use of these services for their quality, but we specifically in the region must reconsider our calculations and evaluate our choices and not support companies that support the Z entity, because in the end our support for them is used to exterminate us. It is true that they always claim that their problem is only with X and Y, but history has proven that they always lie. We do not want to say we were eaten the day the white bull was eaten, or is it too late for that!
So I am against using Google services from a privacy standpoint as well as for their support for the Zs. You should read about Project Nimbus.
I am well aware of this and Waterfox is the Browsee of my choice, but to someone who is using Chrome, give me one valid reason for them to make the switch.
And please tell me what difference would it make to use Firefox to access Gmail, YouTube and other Google services? So you ditched Chrome, which is one of Google'a products, and kept using the rest but thought a different browser?
Is it like iOS AI will be in the future ?
I did not know Firefox's AI uses is locally run on the PC. Does that mean it is safe to use then? No I do not plan on using it just wondering.
I have always wondered about this, and I even asked Brave Leo about it. It replied that using Firefox or Brave for all browsing tasks, even logging into the websites of big tech companies, will not allow them to profile you or reading your browsing history. Is this really true?
Last edited:
I used Chrome for a long time, uninstalled it a couple years ago for Brave, it was painless to import everything.
I would but it's hard for me as I don't know them.
Someone who cares about ad blocking, saying that Firefox is unmatched to any other browser when it comes to ad blocking could make them switch. If someone likes personalization, saying to them that Firefox is the only that's truly customizable. Depends what they like and what kind of user they are really.
No difference at all.
Yes. I haven't ditched for privacy reasons though. Simply because I want the best ad blocking possible.
Basically, when using Firefox AI, nothing is going to the cloud and everything stays on your PC. Even though, Firefox doesn't collect anything through AI and uses it only for processing information in real-time.
I started using the Internet with Netscape Navigator and see no reason to switch away from its successor, Firefox. I only use Edge when Firefox runs into problems with a website—which happens only on rare occasions.
So why is Firefox AI so bad then according to users or some users ?
I still do not like AI but just asking it like that.
Exactly because of what I previously said.
Firefox comes with tiny LMs that don't take a lot of storage and use a lot computing power like regular LLMs. With smaller size comes reduced "knowledge" and capability; and because Firefox AI doesn't collect any data, it's not being trained using user activity. Every time Mozilla wants to improve AI, they have to train it more themselves and then include updated model in new Firefox update.
Now, if you compare that tiny local Firefox AI to Gemini or ChatGPT, that would be like comparing an ant to a Godzilla. Gemini and ChatGPT are using enormous models and they are constantly growing in size because they are actively being trained by users whenever they ask them something. The larger model is, the more power it requires so if you ever wondered why they need to build new data centers and buy almost all inventory of RAM, GPUs and SSDs, that's your answer.
Seamonkey. That would be seamonkey.
I also use seamonkey.
But I wish they will release it natively in ARM64 too.
But I wish they will release it natively in ARM64 too.
What's the appeal of SeaMonkey? It has outdated UI, it's not updated regularly and I'm 100% sure it doesn't support a lot of modern web standards.
I agree. Palemoon is that way too.. It's not 3worth using, even if it wasn't uglier than Danny Devito in drag. But it is.
You may also like...
-
Chrome vs. Firefox vs. Edge in 2026 — Which Browser Should Home Users Trust?- Started by Bot
- Replies: 311
-
Download Sentinel improved functionality new versions- Started by LinuxFan58
- Replies: 77
-
-
Surfshark: Data-hungry browsers: the choice of 90% of users worldwide?- Started by Gandalf_The_Grey
- Replies: 3
-
Some guy asks if Windows Defender/Microsoft Defender is enough and this is the amazing answer he got back- Started by annaegorov
- Replies: 88