Expired Glarysoft Malware Hunter Pro - [1 Year Free License]

[irfanuas]

Malware Hunter provides comprehensive protection against all types of threats, secures your data, protects your privacy and ensures your PC remains virus-free. Hyper scan makes you enjoy a faster scanning speed. Detect and remove stubborn malware, escape the potential danger.

• Virus Scan. Fast hyper scans, detect and remove stubborn malware.
• Automatic updates. Automatic updates provide real-time protection so that your PC is always up to date and secure.
• Process Protection. Aimed at the process, our protection can ensure the safe operation of your computer.

More Info:

Malware Hunter - Virus detection/protection，Scan and clean/remove malware, PC cleanner and speedup software | Glarysoft

Malware Hunter is an award-winning product that provides comprehensive protection against all types of threats, secures your data, protects your privacy and ensures your PC remains virus-free.

www.glarysoft.com

System Requirements:
Windows XP/ Vista/ 7/ 8/ 10

​

 

[gigi64]

Is it powerful? like the zemana and malwarebytes ?

 

[CyberDevil]

Is it powerful? like the zemana and malwarebytes ?

This is a small company that makes various optimizers and tweakers for Windows. They can't have their own antivirus lab, and they refused to rent the Avira engine (I think it was too expensive for them). I believe that this program cannot be compared with Zemana and Malwarebytes. However, it can be forcibly removed from startup and used as a scanner just out of curiosity, if you want.

 

[pxxb1]

I am translating it to Swedish right now and can see that they have been using Avira before, but for now the only protection from them is the USB-protection that uses antivir= Avira. All according to the GUI. The choise that was present before in the GUI to use Avira in gone.

Better or not then Zam, who knows. MBAM make good results now a days so for shure they are not better then them.

I probably will stop translating depending on their answer about what definitions and engines they use.

 

[roger_m]

I tested it again a while back, when I heard it was no longer using Avira signatures and the detection rate is terrible. In my opinion, it's not worth using, even as a second opinion scanner. Malwarebytes, Zemana, HitmanPro, etc, are all much better than this.

 

[roger_m]

I probably will stop translating depending on their answer about what definitions and engines they use.

They now use their own signatures.

 

[zoran popovic]

Thank you.